Chemometric-based machine learning for the forensic classification of fire debris for the presence of self-heating fatty acids following analysis by ASTM E2881

This work introduces a novel application of chemometric-based preprocessing and machine learning for fire debris analysis, which is crucial in origin and cause investigations. The most technically demanding and interpretative aspect of fire debris analysis is the qualitative classification of GC-MS data using pattern matching, which can be performed by artificial intelligence to support human analysts. Three different methods for preprocessing GC-MS data for machine learning, each requiring varying levels of analyst input, were developed using chromatographic software for feature extraction and data export. These methods were evaluated alongside several machine and deep learning models to classify fire debris and liquid samples containing self-heating fatty acids. The dataset comprised 310 samples (153 positive and 157 negative) generated from spontaneous heating experiments, neat exemplars, forensic casework, and pyrolyzed substrates. Models trained on each preprocessing method were evaluated using repeated 2-fold and Monte Carlo cross-validation across multiple training/testing splits. Within the scope of this data set and preprocessing methods, naive bayes, random forest, and gradient boosting performed best across 2-fold evaluations, with mean accuracies of 100%, 99.90%, and 99.65% for the three preprocessing methods. This pilot study demonstrates a novel, chemometric workflow for fatty acid classification and establishes options for extending machine learning to more complicated fire debris tasks such as ignitable liquid residue analysis. The results imply that machine learning has the potential to enhance fire debris analysis by improving accuracy and analytical efficiency by streamlining routine classification tasks, allowing laboratories to allocate expert effort more effectively and reduce turnaround time. • Chemometric-based preprocessing and machine learning for forensic classification • Machine learning models determine whether samples contain self-heating fatty acids. • ASTM E2881 prepared fire debris analyzed by modern machine and deep learning models • odels learn from quantifier-to-qualifier ion ratios in GC-MS data of fire debris • Chemometric preprocessing bridges traditional GC-MS analysis and current AI models

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forensic Science International Reports
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsir.2025.100447
Primary Topic
Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Chemometric-based machine learning for the forensic classification of fire debris for the presence of self-heating fatty acids following analysis by ASTM E2881

Smith Purdum, Justin P. Miller-Schulze
Forensic Science International Reports
Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods
article

Chemometric-based machine learning for the forensic classification of fire debris for the presence of self-heating fatty acids following analysis by ASTM E2881

Smith Purdum, Justin P. Miller-Schulze
article en

Abstract

This work introduces a novel application of chemometric-based preprocessing and machine learning for fire debris analysis, which is crucial in origin and cause investigations. The most technically demanding and interpretative aspect of fire debris analysis is the qualitative classification of GC-MS data using pattern matching, which can be performed by artificial intelligence to support human analysts. Three different methods for preprocessing GC-MS data for machine learning, each requiring varying levels of analyst input, were developed using chromatographic software for feature extraction and data export. These methods were evaluated alongside several machine and deep learning models to classify fire debris and liquid samples containing self-heating fatty acids. The dataset comprised 310 samples (153 positive and 157 negative) generated from spontaneous heating experiments, neat exemplars, forensic casework, and pyrolyzed substrates. Models trained on each preprocessing method were evaluated using repeated 2-fold and Monte Carlo cross-validation across multiple training/testing splits. Within the scope of this data set and preprocessing methods, naive bayes, random forest, and gradient boosting performed best across 2-fold evaluations, with mean accuracies of 100%, 99.90%, and 99.65% for the three preprocessing methods. This pilot study demonstrates a novel, chemometric workflow for fatty acid classification and establishes options for extending machine learning to more complicated fire debris tasks such as ignitable liquid residue analysis. The results imply that machine learning has the potential to enhance fire debris analysis by improving accuracy and analytical efficiency by streamlining routine classification tasks, allowing laboratories to allocate expert effort more effectively and reduce turnaround time. • Chemometric-based preprocessing and machine learning for forensic classification • Machine learning models determine whether samples contain self-heating fatty acids. • ASTM E2881 prepared fire debris analyzed by modern machine and deep learning models • odels learn from quantifier-to-qualifier ion ratios in GC-MS data of fire debris • Chemometric preprocessing bridges traditional GC-MS analysis and current AI models

Forensic Science International ReportsVol. 13
Menlo School (US), California State University, Sacramento (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.