Identifying “Ina Jane Doe”: The Forensic Anthropologists’ Role in Revising and Correcting Narratives in a Cold Case
The 1992 cold case homicide of “Ina Jane Doe” illustrates how an interdisciplinary team worked to identify the decedent using a combined approach of skeletal re-analysis, updated forensic art informed by anthropologists’ input, archival research, and forensic investigative genetic genealogy. The original forensic art for “Ina Jane Doe” showed an over-pathologization of skeletal features and an inaccurate hairstyle; however, the case gained notoriety on internet true crime forums leading to speculation about the decedent’s intellectual capacity and physical appearance. The “Ina Jane Doe” case demonstrates the importance of advocating for skeletal re-analysis as more robust methods and technologies emerge in forensic science, as well as the impact of sustained public interest in cold cases. In this case, continuous public interest and online speculation led to anthropologists constructing a team of experts to correct and revise narratives about the decedent. Forensic anthropologists’ role in cold cases may include offering skeletal re-analysis, recognizing and correcting errors in the original estimations of the biological profile, searching for missing person matches, and/or working collaboratively with subject matter experts in forensic art, odontology and forensic investigative genetic genealogy.
Authors
- Jennifer Bengtson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9648-5804)
- Samantha H. Blatt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4527-9335)
- Amy Michael (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3746-3087)
- Ashanti Maronie
- Samantha Unwin
- Jose Sanchez
Institutions
- Idaho State University (US)
- University of New Hampshire (US)
- Southeast Missouri State University (US)
- Pocatello High School (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Humans
- Published
- 2025-12-30
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/humans6010001
- Primary Topic
- Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00