Does Payment for Ecosystem Services Improve Technical Efficiency of Forage Production? Evidence From China's Grassland Ecological Compensation Policy

ABSTRACT China's Grassland Ecological Compensation Policy (GECP) is the world's most extensive grassland conservation program, based on a payment‐ for‐ ecosystem‐ services framework. Despite comprehensive studies on its impact, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Using survey data collected from 1039 forage farmers in Gansu and Qinghai provinces in China, this study employs a propensity score matching approach to address selection bias from observable factors. A selectivity‐corrected stochastic production frontier model was subsequently applied to correct for the bias due to unobservable characteristics. We find that GECP increased technical efficiency by more than 5.7%. Moreover, the unconditional quantile regression results demonstrate that farmers with higher TE quantiles benefit more from GECP than farmers with lower TE quantiles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural Economics
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.70084
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Payment for Ecosystem Services Improve Technical Efficiency of Forage Production? Evidence From China's Grassland Ecological Compensation Policy

Toba Stephen Olasehinde, Fangbin Qiao, Zhongan Wu, Yubing Fan et al.
Agricultural Economics
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
article

Does Payment for Ecosystem Services Improve Technical Efficiency of Forage Production? Evidence From China's Grassland Ecological Compensation Policy

Toba Stephen Olasehinde, Fangbin Qiao, Zhongan Wu, Yubing Fan, Siyu Yue
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT China's Grassland Ecological Compensation Policy (GECP) is the world's most extensive grassland conservation program, based on a payment‐ for‐ ecosystem‐ services framework. Despite comprehensive studies on its impact, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Using survey data collected from 1039 forage farmers in Gansu and Qinghai provinces in China, this study employs a propensity score matching approach to address selection bias from observable factors. A selectivity‐corrected stochastic production frontier model was subsequently applied to correct for the bias due to unobservable characteristics. We find that GECP increased technical efficiency by more than 5.7%. Moreover, the unconditional quantile regression results demonstrate that farmers with higher TE quantiles benefit more from GECP than farmers with lower TE quantiles.

Agricultural EconomicsVol. 57(1)
Ekiti State University (NG), Central University of Finance and Economics (CN), Ministry of Agriculture (EE)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Does Payment for Ecosystem Services Improve Technical Efficiency of Forage Production? Evidence From China's Grassland Ecological Compensation Policy — Toba Stephen Olasehinde, Fangbin Qiao, et al. · Agricultural Economics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS