Stewardship in Action: An Evaluation of Antibiotic De-Escalation Prescribing After Positive Pneumococcal Urinary Antigen Testing in a Safety Net Health System

The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) recommend pneumococcal urinary antigen testing (UAT) for a subset of inpatients admitted with pneumonia. Despite this, UAT testing is frequently performed on inpatients who do not meet the official IDSA criteria, and current evidence regarding antibiotic de-escalation in UAT-positive cases remains inconclusive. To explore this further, we conducted a retrospective cohort study examining antibiotic de-escalation patterns among hospitalized CAP patients who underwent UAT over a 60-day period during peak respiratory illness season (November and December, 2023). Patients with positive UAT results were compared to those who had negative UAT; the primary outcome was whether a positive UAT impacted antibiotic de-escalation prescribing. A total of 268 patients were analyzed—235 UAT-negative and 33 UAT-positive. Both groups were comparable in terms of disease severity, underlying health conditions, and readmission rates. Empiric therapy targeting Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was used in 40% of patients (36% in the UAT-positive group and 46% of the UAG-negative group). The use of atypical coverage, MRSA coverage, or anti-pseudomonal β-lactams was frequently de-escalated in both cohorts (p < 0.05); however, the UAT-positive group had significantly shorter durations of anti-pseudomonal therapy (p = 0.03) and anti-MRSA therapy (p = 0.02). Despite this, the UAT-positive group was more commonly given fluoroquinolones, such as levofloxacin or moxifloxacin, over narrow-spectrum β-lactams for final antibiotic coverage (p = 0.021). Overall, positive UAT appeared to support earlier discontinuation of anti-MRSA and anti-pseudomonal antibiotics; however, it did not impact fluoroquinolone use. Future antimicrobial stewardship efforts may benefit from promoting greater use of narrow-spectrum β-lactams in these patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
LabMed
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/labmed3010001
Primary Topic
Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stewardship in Action: An Evaluation of Antibiotic De-Escalation Prescribing After Positive Pneumococcal Urinary Antigen Testing in a Safety Net Health System

Lea Monday, Mehak Bhatia, Marco R. Scipione, P. C. Kim et al.
LabMed
Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
article

Stewardship in Action: An Evaluation of Antibiotic De-Escalation Prescribing After Positive Pneumococcal Urinary Antigen Testing in a Safety Net Health System

Lea Monday, Mehak Bhatia, Marco R. Scipione, P. C. Kim, Jyothik Varun Inampudi, Katherine Davanzo, Mazhar Shapoo, Sorabh Dhar
article en

Abstract

The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) recommend pneumococcal urinary antigen testing (UAT) for a subset of inpatients admitted with pneumonia. Despite this, UAT testing is frequently performed on inpatients who do not meet the official IDSA criteria, and current evidence regarding antibiotic de-escalation in UAT-positive cases remains inconclusive. To explore this further, we conducted a retrospective cohort study examining antibiotic de-escalation patterns among hospitalized CAP patients who underwent UAT over a 60-day period during peak respiratory illness season (November and December, 2023). Patients with positive UAT results were compared to those who had negative UAT; the primary outcome was whether a positive UAT impacted antibiotic de-escalation prescribing. A total of 268 patients were analyzed—235 UAT-negative and 33 UAT-positive. Both groups were comparable in terms of disease severity, underlying health conditions, and readmission rates. Empiric therapy targeting Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was used in 40% of patients (36% in the UAT-positive group and 46% of the UAG-negative group). The use of atypical coverage, MRSA coverage, or anti-pseudomonal β-lactams was frequently de-escalated in both cohorts (p < 0.05); however, the UAT-positive group had significantly shorter durations of anti-pseudomonal therapy (p = 0.03) and anti-MRSA therapy (p = 0.02). Despite this, the UAT-positive group was more commonly given fluoroquinolones, such as levofloxacin or moxifloxacin, over narrow-spectrum β-lactams for final antibiotic coverage (p = 0.021). Overall, positive UAT appeared to support earlier discontinuation of anti-MRSA and anti-pseudomonal antibiotics; however, it did not impact fluoroquinolone use. Future antimicrobial stewardship efforts may benefit from promoting greater use of narrow-spectrum β-lactams in these patients.

LabMedVol. 3(1)
Wayne State University (US)
OPEC Fund for International Development, Infectious Diseases Society of America, Wayne State University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.