Determining the Best Algorithm for the Knapsack Problem with Forfeits

In 2024, four papers that presented four different solution approaches for the knapsack problem with forfeits (KPF) appeared in the OR literature. However, none of these four solution approaches compared their performance to the other three on a standard set of 120 KPF test instances. In this short paper, both empirically and statistically, these four KPF solution approaches are compared. Furthermore, by using the solutions from the best method (HESM) among the four to initialize Gurobi, bounded solutions are obtained. For the 120 KPF test instances, this simple hybrid approach resulted in solutions that, on average, were guaranteed to be within 7% of the optimums. This type of guarantee does not exist for other KPF solution methods in the literature. It is very important for operations research (OR) practitioners that need to ensure the value of their solutions to management to have some guarantee of the quality of these solutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mathematics
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/math14010143
Primary Topic
Optimization and Packing Problems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Determining the Best Algorithm for the Knapsack Problem with Forfeits

F. J. Vasko, Peter Cadiz, Myung Soon Song, Yun Lu
Mathematics
Optimization and Packing Problems
article

Determining the Best Algorithm for the Knapsack Problem with Forfeits

F. J. Vasko, Peter Cadiz, Myung Soon Song, Yun Lu
article en

Abstract

In 2024, four papers that presented four different solution approaches for the knapsack problem with forfeits (KPF) appeared in the OR literature. However, none of these four solution approaches compared their performance to the other three on a standard set of 120 KPF test instances. In this short paper, both empirically and statistically, these four KPF solution approaches are compared. Furthermore, by using the solutions from the best method (HESM) among the four to initialize Gurobi, bounded solutions are obtained. For the 120 KPF test instances, this simple hybrid approach resulted in solutions that, on average, were guaranteed to be within 7% of the optimums. This type of guarantee does not exist for other KPF solution methods in the literature. It is very important for operations research (OR) practitioners that need to ensure the value of their solutions to management to have some guarantee of the quality of these solutions.

MathematicsVol. 14(1)
Kutztown University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Optimization and Packing Problems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.