Shear Bond Strength of MDP-Containing Adhesives with and without HEMA: An in Vitro Study

Background and Objectives: The primary role of dental adhesives is to deliver a good bond between the filling material and the tooth. Universal adhesive (UA) systems brought a novel concept by adding active resin monomers that facilitate both micromechanical and chemical adhesion. 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) is a vital component of these adhesives, noted for its strong ionic interaction with hydroxyapatite (HAp) in both enamel and dentin, which leads to the formation of nanolayers of MDP-calcium salts. Evidence suggests that 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA), a monomer that is hydrophilic and improves the adhesive's wetting ability on dental surfaces, may affect MDP’s interaction with hydroxyapatite powder. In view of this, the present study aimed to assess the differences in shear value of bond strength between two MDP-containing multi-mode bonding systems: Futurabond M+ (VOCO, Germany), which contains HEMA, and G-Premio Bond (GC, Japan), a HEMA-free alternative. Materials and Method: Forty extracted human maxillary premolars were separated into two groups (n=20). The occlusal portion was removed to gain a smooth dentin surface. Adhesives were applied per manufacturers’ instructions, followed by composite resin build-up (Palfique LX5, Tokuyama, Japan). After 24-hour water storage at 37°C, using a universal testing machine (TERCO, MT 3037, Sweden) at 1.0 mm/min, shear bond strength was tested. To analyze the data, an independent t-test (p < 0.01) was used. Results: Futurabond M+ (HEMA-containing) exhibited significantly higher shear bond strength (19.74 ± 4.80 MPa) than G-Premio Bond (HEMA-free) (14.33 ± 5.80 MPa) (p = 0.001). The mean difference (5.41 MPa) and large effect size (Cohen’s d = 1.017) show that the greater bond strength attained with VOCO Futurabond M+ is statistically important and expressive in a practical, clinical situation. Conclusion: HEMA-containing Futurabond M+ produced higher shear bond strength to dentin compared to HEMA-free G-Premio Bond, probably due to HEMA, ethanol, and higher pH. The adhesive act is dependent on numerous factors; therefore, additional investigations are necessary. Keywords: HEMA, Shear bond strength, Universal adhesives, MDP.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Erbil Dental Journal
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15218/edj.2025.21
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Shear Bond Strength of MDP-Containing Adhesives with and without HEMA: An in Vitro Study

Shakhawan Kadir, Ahmed S. Hasan
Erbil Dental Journal
Dental materials and restorations
article

Shear Bond Strength of MDP-Containing Adhesives with and without HEMA: An in Vitro Study

Shakhawan Kadir, Ahmed S. Hasan
article en

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The primary role of dental adhesives is to deliver a good bond between the filling material and the tooth. Universal adhesive (UA) systems brought a novel concept by adding active resin monomers that facilitate both micromechanical and chemical adhesion. 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) is a vital component of these adhesives, noted for its strong ionic interaction with hydroxyapatite (HAp) in both enamel and dentin, which leads to the formation of nanolayers of MDP-calcium salts. Evidence suggests that 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA), a monomer that is hydrophilic and improves the adhesive's wetting ability on dental surfaces, may affect MDP’s interaction with hydroxyapatite powder. In view of this, the present study aimed to assess the differences in shear value of bond strength between two MDP-containing multi-mode bonding systems: Futurabond M+ (VOCO, Germany), which contains HEMA, and G-Premio Bond (GC, Japan), a HEMA-free alternative. Materials and Method: Forty extracted human maxillary premolars were separated into two groups (n=20). The occlusal portion was removed to gain a smooth dentin surface. Adhesives were applied per manufacturers’ instructions, followed by composite resin build-up (Palfique LX5, Tokuyama, Japan). After 24-hour water storage at 37°C, using a universal testing machine (TERCO, MT 3037, Sweden) at 1.0 mm/min, shear bond strength was tested. To analyze the data, an independent t-test (p < 0.01) was used. Results: Futurabond M+ (HEMA-containing) exhibited significantly higher shear bond strength (19.74 ± 4.80 MPa) than G-Premio Bond (HEMA-free) (14.33 ± 5.80 MPa) (p = 0.001). The mean difference (5.41 MPa) and large effect size (Cohen’s d = 1.017) show that the greater bond strength attained with VOCO Futurabond M+ is statistically important and expressive in a practical, clinical situation. Conclusion: HEMA-containing Futurabond M+ produced higher shear bond strength to dentin compared to HEMA-free G-Premio Bond, probably due to HEMA, ethanol, and higher pH. The adhesive act is dependent on numerous factors; therefore, additional investigations are necessary. Keywords: HEMA, Shear bond strength, Universal adhesives, MDP.

Erbil Dental JournalVol. 8(2)
Hawler Medical University (IQ)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.