The Synergy Between the Travel Cost Method and Other Valuation Techniques for Ecosystem Services: A Systematic Review

This systematic review examined how the Travel Cost Method (TCM) works together with other valuation methods, such as stated and declared preferences, to improve estimates of total economic value (TEV). Despite the widespread use of TCM, no systematic synthesis has examined how its integration with complementary methods enhances TEV estimation across different ecosystems and geographical contexts. Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted searches in Scopus and Web of Science, identifying 245 records. After the screening process, 57 studies remained for analysis. Results show that 74% of the studies combined TCM with Contingent Valuation Method (CVM), and 12.3% with Choice Experiment (CEM). Three chronological phases were identified: early domination by the United States (1985–2000), international expansion and diversification (2001–2015), and recent methodological innovation led by China (2016–2024). Forest and recreational ecosystems accounted for 25% of applications, followed by marine-coastal (21%). Within cultural ecosystem services, the subcategory of physical and experiential interactions predominates with 63.1%. Comparative analysis indicates that TCM systematically produces higher and more variable monetary estimates than CVM, reflecting its sensitivity to travel behavior and spatial scale, while stated preference methods provide more stable estimates of non-use values. Persistent methodological limitations include non-probabilistic sampling and uneven ecosystem coverage. This review advances the literature by providing the first comprehensive synthesis of integrated TCM applications, demonstrating how methodological combinations strengthen TEV estimation beyond single-method approaches. The findings offer practical guidance for policymakers designing environmental impact assessments, environmental managers selecting valuation tools tailored to ecosystem and management objectives, and researchers seeking standardized and robust frameworks for integrated ecosystem service valuation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environments
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/environments13010018
Primary Topic
Economic and Environmental Valuation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Synergy Between the Travel Cost Method and Other Valuation Techniques for Ecosystem Services: A Systematic Review

Omer Cruz, Ligia García, Einstein Bravo Campos, Erick Stevinsonn Arellanos Carrion et al.
Environments
Economic and Environmental Valuation
article

The Synergy Between the Travel Cost Method and Other Valuation Techniques for Ecosystem Services: A Systematic Review

Omer Cruz, Ligia García, Einstein Bravo Campos, Erick Stevinsonn Arellanos Carrion, Einstein Sánchez Bardales
article en

Abstract

This systematic review examined how the Travel Cost Method (TCM) works together with other valuation methods, such as stated and declared preferences, to improve estimates of total economic value (TEV). Despite the widespread use of TCM, no systematic synthesis has examined how its integration with complementary methods enhances TEV estimation across different ecosystems and geographical contexts. Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted searches in Scopus and Web of Science, identifying 245 records. After the screening process, 57 studies remained for analysis. Results show that 74% of the studies combined TCM with Contingent Valuation Method (CVM), and 12.3% with Choice Experiment (CEM). Three chronological phases were identified: early domination by the United States (1985–2000), international expansion and diversification (2001–2015), and recent methodological innovation led by China (2016–2024). Forest and recreational ecosystems accounted for 25% of applications, followed by marine-coastal (21%). Within cultural ecosystem services, the subcategory of physical and experiential interactions predominates with 63.1%. Comparative analysis indicates that TCM systematically produces higher and more variable monetary estimates than CVM, reflecting its sensitivity to travel behavior and spatial scale, while stated preference methods provide more stable estimates of non-use values. Persistent methodological limitations include non-probabilistic sampling and uneven ecosystem coverage. This review advances the literature by providing the first comprehensive synthesis of integrated TCM applications, demonstrating how methodological combinations strengthen TEV estimation beyond single-method approaches. The findings offer practical guidance for policymakers designing environmental impact assessments, environmental managers selecting valuation tools tailored to ecosystem and management objectives, and researchers seeking standardized and robust frameworks for integrated ecosystem service valuation.

EnvironmentsVol. 13(1)
National University Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza (PE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Economic and Environmental Valuation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.