Orthognathic Surgery in Completely Edentulous Patients: A Systematic Review of Planning and Outcomes

The management of dentofacial deformities in completely edentulous patients remains one of the most demanding challenges in maxillofacial surgery due to the absence of occlusal references and severe bone resorption. This systematic review, conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, critically analyzed available evidence on the planning and execution of orthognathic surgery in this population. A comprehensive search of 8 databases identified 8 eligible studies encompassing 34 fully edentulous patients. Le Fort I osteotomy was the predominant procedure (91%), frequently combined with bone grafting and implant-supported rehabilitation (74%). Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy, maxillomandibular advancement, and distraction osteogenesis were less frequent. Digital workflows using virtual planning, CAD/CAM guides, and patient-specific implants demonstrated high positional accuracy (≤1.5 mm) and favorable esthetic and functional outcomes. Reported complications were minimal, including 9 implant losses (7.9%) and a single corrected maxillary relapse. Despite the feasibility and promising results, current evidence remains limited and heterogeneous, precluding robust clinical recommendations. Standardized, prospective studies integrating digital and prosthetic protocols are essential to consolidate orthognathic surgery as a safe and reproducible option for the rehabilitation of edentulous patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000012259
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Orthognathic Surgery in Completely Edentulous Patients: A Systematic Review of Planning and Outcomes

Andressa Bolognesi Bachesk, Lara Scandelai Licce, João Victor da Mota Lobianco, Sthefany Yanka Tomaz Gomes et al.
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

Orthognathic Surgery in Completely Edentulous Patients: A Systematic Review of Planning and Outcomes

Andressa Bolognesi Bachesk, Lara Scandelai Licce, João Victor da Mota Lobianco, Sthefany Yanka Tomaz Gomes, Amanda Cardoso Moura
article en

Abstract

The management of dentofacial deformities in completely edentulous patients remains one of the most demanding challenges in maxillofacial surgery due to the absence of occlusal references and severe bone resorption. This systematic review, conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, critically analyzed available evidence on the planning and execution of orthognathic surgery in this population. A comprehensive search of 8 databases identified 8 eligible studies encompassing 34 fully edentulous patients. Le Fort I osteotomy was the predominant procedure (91%), frequently combined with bone grafting and implant-supported rehabilitation (74%). Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy, maxillomandibular advancement, and distraction osteogenesis were less frequent. Digital workflows using virtual planning, CAD/CAM guides, and patient-specific implants demonstrated high positional accuracy (≤1.5 mm) and favorable esthetic and functional outcomes. Reported complications were minimal, including 9 implant losses (7.9%) and a single corrected maxillary relapse. Despite the feasibility and promising results, current evidence remains limited and heterogeneous, precluding robust clinical recommendations. Standardized, prospective studies integrating digital and prosthetic protocols are essential to consolidate orthognathic surgery as a safe and reproducible option for the rehabilitation of edentulous patients.

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (BR), Institución Universitaria Colegios de Colombia (CO)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.