Waste to energy: performance evaluation of a bubbling fluidized bed gasifier using biomass blends and facemask

• Optimized Bubbling Fluidized Bed gasification parameters for groundnut shell, rice husk, wood shavings, and facemask feedstocks. • Checked possibility for gasification of facemask Covid-19 medical waste. • Compare and identify the best feedstock among selected feedstocks. • Fluidized bed gasification techniques enable better air flow control, feed rate, and low emissions. • Sustainable waste-to-energy approach using woody biomass and discarded facemasks through thermal treatment. Rapid industrialization and population growth in developing countries have increased energy demand, emphasizing the need for sustainable alternatives. Growing environmental concerns have increased interest in thermal conversion methods such as pyrolysis, co-pyrolysis, and biomass gasification for converting agricultural and municipal wastes into clean energy. This investigation examines the impact of the Equivalence Ratio (ER) on Carbon Conversion Efficiency (CCE) and resultant syngas composition across various feedstocks within a Bubbling Fluidized Bed Gasification (BFBG) system. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations were performed to analyse gas–solid hydrodynamics. CFD analysis indicated that lighter feedstocks, such as rice husk, migrated to the freeboard region at 0.4ER, whereas denser materials, including groundnut shell and wooden shavings, remained concentrated in the mid-bed zone, resulting in enhanced gasification reactions. Experimental results revealed that increasing the ER enhanced hydrogen and methane concentrations across all feedstocks. Groundnut shell achieved 6.4 % H 2 , 5.6 % CH 4 , a gross calorific value (GCV) of 4.6 MJ.m −3 , and a CCE of 83 % at 0.4ER. In contrast, rice husk showed minimal improvement with 3.6 % H 2 due to its high ash content and exhibited the lowest CCE of 35 %. Wood shavings displayed moderate gasification performance with 4.4 % H 2 and 4.2 % CH 4 . The surgical face mask demonstrated superior performance, producing 17.6 % H 2 and 9.4 % CH 4 at 0.4ER, with a high-calorific syngas (8 MJ·m −3 GCV), confirming its efficiency as a waste-to-energy feedstock. The correlation between CFD predictions and experimental data validated the reliability of the model and its applicability for optimizing feedstock utilization in sustainable thermal energy generation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Thermal Science and Engineering Progress
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2025.104470
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Waste to energy: performance evaluation of a bubbling fluidized bed gasifier using biomass blends and facemask

Dharmendra Sapariya, A.D. Dhass, J.P. Makwana, Dhiren Patel et al.
1 citations
Thermal Science and Engineering Progress
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
0.67
article

Waste to energy: performance evaluation of a bubbling fluidized bed gasifier using biomass blends and facemask

Dharmendra Sapariya, A.D. Dhass, J.P. Makwana, Dhiren Patel, Umang Patdiwala, Khalid Saeed, Jay Makwana, Mustufa Haider Abidi, Hisham Alkhalefah, Ruchir Parikh
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Optimized Bubbling Fluidized Bed gasification parameters for groundnut shell, rice husk, wood shavings, and facemask feedstocks. • Checked possibility for gasification of facemask Covid-19 medical waste. • Compare and identify the best feedstock among selected feedstocks. • Fluidized bed gasification techniques enable better air flow control, feed rate, and low emissions. • Sustainable waste-to-energy approach using woody biomass and discarded facemasks through thermal treatment. Rapid industrialization and population growth in developing countries have increased energy demand, emphasizing the need for sustainable alternatives. Growing environmental concerns have increased interest in thermal conversion methods such as pyrolysis, co-pyrolysis, and biomass gasification for converting agricultural and municipal wastes into clean energy. This investigation examines the impact of the Equivalence Ratio (ER) on Carbon Conversion Efficiency (CCE) and resultant syngas composition across various feedstocks within a Bubbling Fluidized Bed Gasification (BFBG) system. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations were performed to analyse gas–solid hydrodynamics. CFD analysis indicated that lighter feedstocks, such as rice husk, migrated to the freeboard region at 0.4ER, whereas denser materials, including groundnut shell and wooden shavings, remained concentrated in the mid-bed zone, resulting in enhanced gasification reactions. Experimental results revealed that increasing the ER enhanced hydrogen and methane concentrations across all feedstocks. Groundnut shell achieved 6.4 % H 2 , 5.6 % CH 4 , a gross calorific value (GCV) of 4.6 MJ.m −3 , and a CCE of 83 % at 0.4ER. In contrast, rice husk showed minimal improvement with 3.6 % H 2 due to its high ash content and exhibited the lowest CCE of 35 %. Wood shavings displayed moderate gasification performance with 4.4 % H 2 and 4.2 % CH 4 . The surgical face mask demonstrated superior performance, producing 17.6 % H 2 and 9.4 % CH 4 at 0.4ER, with a high-calorific syngas (8 MJ·m −3 GCV), confirming its efficiency as a waste-to-energy feedstock. The correlation between CFD predictions and experimental data validated the reliability of the model and its applicability for optimizing feedstock utilization in sustainable thermal energy generation.

Thermal Science and Engineering ProgressVol. 69
National Forensic Sciences University (IN), University of Ulster (GB), King Saud University (SA), Indus University (IN), Central University of Gujarat (IN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.