Power Aware Cluster Orchestration: Taxonomy, Initial Results, and Challenges

Compute clusters are major power consumers in Cloud and Edge data centers, making it critical to reduce power usage and costs without compromising service levels objectives. Energy Performance Preference (EPP) settings and CPU frequency scaling can lower power but typically at the cost of reduced performance. When considering clusters with heterogeneous power profiles, it is essential to map workloads to the most suitable profile based on their quality-of-service constraints. Current orchestrators overlook power-profile heterogeneity; this is a particular concern at the Edge, where otherwise identical hardware may range from power-optimized to performance-oriented yet remain indistinguishable to schedulers. We present a taxonomy of power-aware orchestration, and extend the default Kubernetes scheduler with power-profile awareness. We evaluate the feasibility of this extended scheduler by comparing three power profile-aware scheduling strategies on a testbed running a microservices benchmark, with results showing that average power use can be reduced by up to 12% while maintaining application performance. We conclude with key challenges and future research directions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3773274.3774698
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cloud Computing and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.25

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Power Aware Cluster Orchestration: Taxonomy, Initial Results, and Challenges

Thijs Metsch, Paul Townend, Ileet Malla
1 citations
Cloud Computing and Resource Management
3.25
article

Power Aware Cluster Orchestration: Taxonomy, Initial Results, and Challenges

Thijs Metsch, Paul Townend, Ileet Malla
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Compute clusters are major power consumers in Cloud and Edge data centers, making it critical to reduce power usage and costs without compromising service levels objectives. Energy Performance Preference (EPP) settings and CPU frequency scaling can lower power but typically at the cost of reduced performance. When considering clusters with heterogeneous power profiles, it is essential to map workloads to the most suitable profile based on their quality-of-service constraints. Current orchestrators overlook power-profile heterogeneity; this is a particular concern at the Edge, where otherwise identical hardware may range from power-optimized to performance-oriented yet remain indistinguishable to schedulers. We present a taxonomy of power-aware orchestration, and extend the default Kubernetes scheduler with power-profile awareness. We evaluate the feasibility of this extended scheduler by comparing three power profile-aware scheduling strategies on a testbed running a microservices benchmark, with results showing that average power use can be reduced by up to 12% while maintaining application performance. We conclude with key challenges and future research directions.

Intel (Germany) (DE), Umeå University (SE)
European Commission, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Cloud Computing and Resource Management
3.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.