Concurrent rates of pathology confirmed adenomyosis and endometriosis

• Only 55.8% of patients with endometriosis undergoing hysterectomy had adenomyosis. • Parity, uterine weight, and prior endometriosis surgery did not predict adenomyosis. • Prior D&C and absence of dyspareunia were significant predictors for adenomyosis. • Imaging had low sensitivity (29–39%) but high specificity (76–100%) for adenomyosis. • TVUS showed the highest PPV (100%), but all imaging lacked strong rule-out accuracy. Understand rates of pathology confirmed adenomyosis occurring in the setting of endometriosis and identify predictive factors for the diagnosis of adenomyosis. Retrospective cross-sectional study of patients undergoing concurrent hysterectomy and excision of pathology confirmed endometriosis over a two-year period. Patients without pathology confirmed endometriosis were excluded. Six full-thickness uterine sections for histologic analysis was performed to thoroughly evaluate for adenomyosis. A total of 95 patients with pathology confirmed endometriosis were identified that also underwent hysterectomy during the study period. Adenomyosis was pathologically noted in 53 individuals (55.8%; CI: 45.2%, 66.0%).The primary indications for hysterectomy were pelvic pain (78.9%), heavy menstrual bleeding (37.9%), and endometriosis (24.2%). Significant factors included age [adenomyosis: 40.9 years (SD = 7.1) vs no adenomyosis: 38.1 years (7.4)] (p = 0.026), dyspareunia (52.9% vs 81.0%; p = 0.006) and prior dilation and curettage (D&C) (24.5% vs 9.5%; p = 0.039). There were no statistically significant differences in parity, uterine weight, endometriosis stage, or history of cesarean section, laparotomy, or laparoscopy in those with or without adenomyosis. After adjusting for age, ethnicity, and imaging type, patients with prior D&C were 4.6 times at risk of having adenomyosis (OR: 4.6; CI: 1.19, 23.5). However, patients with dyspareunia were less likely to have adenomyosis (OR: 0.21; CI: 0.06, 0.61). In this population, 45.2% did not have coexisting adenomyosis. Despite overlapping symptomology between endometriosis and adenomyosis, unique clinical factors, such as prior D&C and absence of dyspareunia, were found to be predictive of adenomyosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Endometriosis and Uterine Disorders
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeud.2025.100149
Primary Topic
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Concurrent rates of pathology confirmed adenomyosis and endometriosis

Christopher Dodoo, Longwen Chen, Sanjanaa Senthilkumar, Megan Wasson
Journal of Endometriosis and Uterine Disorders
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
article

Concurrent rates of pathology confirmed adenomyosis and endometriosis

Christopher Dodoo, Longwen Chen, Sanjanaa Senthilkumar, Megan Wasson
article en

Abstract

• Only 55.8% of patients with endometriosis undergoing hysterectomy had adenomyosis. • Parity, uterine weight, and prior endometriosis surgery did not predict adenomyosis. • Prior D&C and absence of dyspareunia were significant predictors for adenomyosis. • Imaging had low sensitivity (29–39%) but high specificity (76–100%) for adenomyosis. • TVUS showed the highest PPV (100%), but all imaging lacked strong rule-out accuracy. Understand rates of pathology confirmed adenomyosis occurring in the setting of endometriosis and identify predictive factors for the diagnosis of adenomyosis. Retrospective cross-sectional study of patients undergoing concurrent hysterectomy and excision of pathology confirmed endometriosis over a two-year period. Patients without pathology confirmed endometriosis were excluded. Six full-thickness uterine sections for histologic analysis was performed to thoroughly evaluate for adenomyosis. A total of 95 patients with pathology confirmed endometriosis were identified that also underwent hysterectomy during the study period. Adenomyosis was pathologically noted in 53 individuals (55.8%; CI: 45.2%, 66.0%).The primary indications for hysterectomy were pelvic pain (78.9%), heavy menstrual bleeding (37.9%), and endometriosis (24.2%). Significant factors included age [adenomyosis: 40.9 years (SD = 7.1) vs no adenomyosis: 38.1 years (7.4)] (p = 0.026), dyspareunia (52.9% vs 81.0%; p = 0.006) and prior dilation and curettage (D&C) (24.5% vs 9.5%; p = 0.039). There were no statistically significant differences in parity, uterine weight, endometriosis stage, or history of cesarean section, laparotomy, or laparoscopy in those with or without adenomyosis. After adjusting for age, ethnicity, and imaging type, patients with prior D&C were 4.6 times at risk of having adenomyosis (OR: 4.6; CI: 1.19, 23.5). However, patients with dyspareunia were less likely to have adenomyosis (OR: 0.21; CI: 0.06, 0.61). In this population, 45.2% did not have coexisting adenomyosis. Despite overlapping symptomology between endometriosis and adenomyosis, unique clinical factors, such as prior D&C and absence of dyspareunia, were found to be predictive of adenomyosis.

Journal of Endometriosis and Uterine DisordersVol. 14
Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Mayo Clinic Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.