Comparative study to assess the efficacy of ropivacaine (0.25%) with magnesium sulfate versus ropivacaine (0.25%) with dexmedetomidine in USG-guided pectoral nerve block type I and II in unilateral breast surgery

Background: Post-operative pain following breast surgery can impair recovery and contribute to chronic pain syndromes. Ultrasound-guided pectoral nerve block (PECS I and II) blocks have emerged as effective regional anesthesia techniques. Adding adjuvants to ropivacaine may prolong analgesia and enhance patient comfort. Aims and Objectives: This study aims to compare the efficacy of 0.25% ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine versus 0.25% ropivacaine with magnesium sulfate in PECS I and II blocks for unilateral breast surgery. Materials and Methods: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind trial, 100 American Society of Anesthesiologists I–II female patients aged 18–60 years undergoing unilateral breast surgery under general anesthesia were allocated equally to receive PECS I and II blocks with ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine (Group A) or ropivacaine plus magnesium sulfate (Group B). Primary outcomes included post-operative pain scores, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), time to first rescue analgesia, and total 24-h analgesic consumption. Secondary outcomes were intraoperative hemodynamics, patient satisfaction, and adverse effects. Results: Group A demonstrated significantly lower VAS scores at 1 h (1.61±0.51 vs. 1.92±0.57, P=0.02) and 6 h (2.33±0.68 vs. 3.09±0.72, P=0.001) postoperatively. Time to first rescue analgesia was longer in Group A (9.8±1.5 h vs. 6.5±2.0 h, P=0.002) with reduced paracetamol use over 24 h (1.905±0.450 g vs. 2.915±0.651 g, P=0.001). Patient satisfaction was higher in Group A (8.8±0.7 vs. 7.9±1.0, P=0.003). Hemodynamic parameters and adverse effects were comparable, though bradycardia was more frequent in Group A without clinical significance. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine in PECS blocks provides superior early post-operative analgesia, prolonged pain-free intervals, reduced analgesic consumption, and higher satisfaction compared to magnesium sulfate, with similar safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71152/ajms.v17i1.4878
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative study to assess the efficacy of ropivacaine (0.25%) with magnesium sulfate versus ropivacaine (0.25%) with dexmedetomidine in USG-guided pectoral nerve block type I and II in unilateral breast surgery

Roopesh Kumar, Chavi Sethi, Anmol Yadav
Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Comparative study to assess the efficacy of ropivacaine (0.25%) with magnesium sulfate versus ropivacaine (0.25%) with dexmedetomidine in USG-guided pectoral nerve block type I and II in unilateral breast surgery

Roopesh Kumar, Chavi Sethi, Anmol Yadav
article en

Abstract

Background: Post-operative pain following breast surgery can impair recovery and contribute to chronic pain syndromes. Ultrasound-guided pectoral nerve block (PECS I and II) blocks have emerged as effective regional anesthesia techniques. Adding adjuvants to ropivacaine may prolong analgesia and enhance patient comfort. Aims and Objectives: This study aims to compare the efficacy of 0.25% ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine versus 0.25% ropivacaine with magnesium sulfate in PECS I and II blocks for unilateral breast surgery. Materials and Methods: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind trial, 100 American Society of Anesthesiologists I–II female patients aged 18–60 years undergoing unilateral breast surgery under general anesthesia were allocated equally to receive PECS I and II blocks with ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine (Group A) or ropivacaine plus magnesium sulfate (Group B). Primary outcomes included post-operative pain scores, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), time to first rescue analgesia, and total 24-h analgesic consumption. Secondary outcomes were intraoperative hemodynamics, patient satisfaction, and adverse effects. Results: Group A demonstrated significantly lower VAS scores at 1 h (1.61±0.51 vs. 1.92±0.57, P=0.02) and 6 h (2.33±0.68 vs. 3.09±0.72, P=0.001) postoperatively. Time to first rescue analgesia was longer in Group A (9.8±1.5 h vs. 6.5±2.0 h, P=0.002) with reduced paracetamol use over 24 h (1.905±0.450 g vs. 2.915±0.651 g, P=0.001). Patient satisfaction was higher in Group A (8.8±0.7 vs. 7.9±1.0, P=0.003). Hemodynamic parameters and adverse effects were comparable, though bradycardia was more frequent in Group A without clinical significance. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine in PECS blocks provides superior early post-operative analgesia, prolonged pain-free intervals, reduced analgesic consumption, and higher satisfaction compared to magnesium sulfate, with similar safety.

Asian Journal of Medical SciencesVol. 17(1)
Maharani Laxmi Bai Medical College (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.