Exploring modern end-to-end AI-based multi-view 3D reconstruction
Abstract. Deriving accurate 3D geometry from multi-view 2D imagery remains a fundamental problem in photogrammetry and computer vision. Conventional pipelines, comprising feature extraction, image matching, bundle adjustment and dense reconstruction, are grounded in well-established geometric principles but remain sensitive to complex scenarios such as significant illumination variability, deficiency in texture and high variability in viewing angles. Recent deep learning developments have triggered a paradigm shift, reformulating multi-view 3D reconstruction as a data-driven, end-to-end optimization problem. Neural architectures now jointly learn feature representations, correspondence estimation and geometric reasoning, supported by large-scale training datasets, high-performance GPU computation, transformer networks and differentiable rendering frameworks. This study methodically examines the transition from traditional photogrammetric approaches to end-to-end AI-based reconstruction pipelines. Using benchmark geomatic datasets, we quantitatively evaluate the performance of two recent and representative end-to-end deep learning methods compared to classical photogrammetry. Results highlight performances of AI-driven approaches in 3D reconstructions and their limits for in large-scale, metric-oriented mapping and modeling applications.
Authors
- J. Boehm (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2190-0449)
- Fabio Remondino
- Zichao Zeng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8975-875X)
- June Moh Goo
- Luca Morelli
Institutions
- Fondazione Bruno Kessler (IT)
- University College London (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- The international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences
- Published
- 2025-12-31
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xlviii-1-w6-2025-91-2025
- Primary Topic
- 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council