Development of the Extended Lane and Sandu Score to Assess Osseous Repair

Lane and Sandhu introduced a radiological score to evaluate bone union in animal and human models after experimental bone grafting. We introduce an extension of the Lane and Sandhu Scoring system to serve as a more granular system for robust bone healing assessment in clinical research. We describe the application of this scoring system in the context of an autologous cell-based osteogenic implant (NVD003) designed to improve the rate of bone union. Images from four participants with congenital pseudoarthrosis of the tibia (CPT) and 9 adults with recurrent osseous non-union after conventional surgery were obtained. All participants underwent NVD003 implantation. An extended version of the Lane and Sandhu scoring system (eLSS; range from 0 to 12) was employed to assess bone formation, union, and remodeling by two independent readers longitudinally, with final adjudication in cases of > 1 point disagreement. Interobserver agreement was assessed using quadratic weighted kappa. 206 exams (170 radiographs and 36 CT scans) were studied across the two pathologies (81 scans for participants with CPT and 125 scans for participants with recurrent osseous non-union). Overall agreement between the expert readers was found to be 0.84 (95% CI: 0.79, 0.89), with comparable agreement found per modality (radiographs [0.85] and CT images [0.76]) and per pathology (CPT [0.83] and recurrent osseous non-union [0.84]). These results support that the eLSS has sufficient reliability to warrant further consideration for clinical trial use. Additional studies with a greater number of subjects, raters, and variety of use cases are required to validate and optimize this method. Level of Evidence: III.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Orthopaedic Research®
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.70126
Primary Topic
Bone fractures and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of the Extended Lane and Sandu Score to Assess Osseous Repair

John A. Carrino, Olga Kubassova, Mikael Boesen, Denis Dufrane et al.
Journal of Orthopaedic Research®
Bone fractures and treatments
article

Development of the Extended Lane and Sandu Score to Assess Osseous Repair

John A. Carrino, Olga Kubassova, Mikael Boesen, Denis Dufrane, Hamza Ahmed Ibad, Judy Ashworth
article en

Abstract

Lane and Sandhu introduced a radiological score to evaluate bone union in animal and human models after experimental bone grafting. We introduce an extension of the Lane and Sandhu Scoring system to serve as a more granular system for robust bone healing assessment in clinical research. We describe the application of this scoring system in the context of an autologous cell-based osteogenic implant (NVD003) designed to improve the rate of bone union. Images from four participants with congenital pseudoarthrosis of the tibia (CPT) and 9 adults with recurrent osseous non-union after conventional surgery were obtained. All participants underwent NVD003 implantation. An extended version of the Lane and Sandhu scoring system (eLSS; range from 0 to 12) was employed to assess bone formation, union, and remodeling by two independent readers longitudinally, with final adjudication in cases of > 1 point disagreement. Interobserver agreement was assessed using quadratic weighted kappa. 206 exams (170 radiographs and 36 CT scans) were studied across the two pathologies (81 scans for participants with CPT and 125 scans for participants with recurrent osseous non-union). Overall agreement between the expert readers was found to be 0.84 (95% CI: 0.79, 0.89), with comparable agreement found per modality (radiographs [0.85] and CT images [0.76]) and per pathology (CPT [0.83] and recurrent osseous non-union [0.84]). These results support that the eLSS has sufficient reliability to warrant further consideration for clinical trial use. Additional studies with a greater number of subjects, raters, and variety of use cases are required to validate and optimize this method. Level of Evidence: III.

Journal of Orthopaedic Research®Vol. 44(1)
Hospital for Special Surgery (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Frederiksberg Hospital (DK), Novadip (Belgium) (BE), Institute of Group Analysis (GB)
Johns Hopkins University, Hospital for Special Surgery, Gentofte Hospital, Bispebjerg Hospital
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Bone fractures and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.