Beyond human health – Exploring farmers' perspectives on pesticides in Swiss agriculture

Farmers face numerous challenges and hazards that may affect health. Plant protection products (PPPs) are often investigated and criticized in terms of their effects on human and environmental health. However, research and public debates seldomly discuss farmers’ perspectives on plant protection-related health risks. Using qualitative methods, including semi-structured interviews with 28 farmers, ethnographic observations, and one 3-day farm visit, we examined how farmers perceive and manage health risks related to PPPs and other plant protection strategies. Contrary to some public opinions in Switzerland viewing farmers as "polluters", participants evaluated plant protection-related health risks for humans and the environment. Thereby, farmers often expressed greater concerns for environmental than human health. However, results further highlight that farmers’ perceptions of the severity of these health risks were heterogeneous. Farmers employed different management strategies to minimize health risks and viewed regulatory bodies and technological advancements as important drivers for reducing plant protection-related risks for human and environmental health. They also acknowledged their role and sometimes limited scope of action in a complex system with various economic, socio-political, individual, regulatory, and environmental constraints. Lastly, farmers perceived the importance of non-human health in and for their livelihoods and highlighted their dependence on weather and climate patterns. Therefore, the present work concludes that moving beyond the distinction of human and environmental health in practice and policy may offer the opportunity to jointly improve human and non-human health and well-being and better integrate farmers’ realities into the development toward sustainable agriculture in Switzerland. • Swiss farmers perceive human and environmental health risks in plant protection. • Environmental health was often of greater concern than human health impacts. • Regulations and technology are seen as important tools to reduce health risks. • Participants acknowledge a healthy environment as crucial for their livelihoods. • Swiss farmers perceive limited scope of action in a complex agricultural system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Rural Studies
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103995
Primary Topic
Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond human health – Exploring farmers' perspectives on pesticides in Swiss agriculture

M. Imboden, N. Probst-Hensch, M.S. Winkler, S. Fuhrimann et al.
Journal of Rural Studies
Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
article

Beyond human health – Exploring farmers' perspectives on pesticides in Swiss agriculture

M. Imboden, N. Probst-Hensch, M.S. Winkler, S. Fuhrimann, J. Doetzer, K. Ingold, A. Kaiser-Grolimund, S. Merten, P. Ammann
article en

Abstract

Farmers face numerous challenges and hazards that may affect health. Plant protection products (PPPs) are often investigated and criticized in terms of their effects on human and environmental health. However, research and public debates seldomly discuss farmers’ perspectives on plant protection-related health risks. Using qualitative methods, including semi-structured interviews with 28 farmers, ethnographic observations, and one 3-day farm visit, we examined how farmers perceive and manage health risks related to PPPs and other plant protection strategies. Contrary to some public opinions in Switzerland viewing farmers as "polluters", participants evaluated plant protection-related health risks for humans and the environment. Thereby, farmers often expressed greater concerns for environmental than human health. However, results further highlight that farmers’ perceptions of the severity of these health risks were heterogeneous. Farmers employed different management strategies to minimize health risks and viewed regulatory bodies and technological advancements as important drivers for reducing plant protection-related risks for human and environmental health. They also acknowledged their role and sometimes limited scope of action in a complex system with various economic, socio-political, individual, regulatory, and environmental constraints. Lastly, farmers perceived the importance of non-human health in and for their livelihoods and highlighted their dependence on weather and climate patterns. Therefore, the present work concludes that moving beyond the distinction of human and environmental health in practice and policy may offer the opportunity to jointly improve human and non-human health and well-being and better integrate farmers’ realities into the development toward sustainable agriculture in Switzerland. • Swiss farmers perceive human and environmental health risks in plant protection. • Environmental health was often of greater concern than human health impacts. • Regulations and technology are seen as important tools to reduce health risks. • Participants acknowledge a healthy environment as crucial for their livelihoods. • Swiss farmers perceive limited scope of action in a complex agricultural system.

Journal of Rural StudiesVol. 122
University of Bern (CH), Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research (CH), Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (CH), University of Basel (CH), Durham University (GB), Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (CH)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.