Generative artificial intelligence and editorial ethics: a roadmap for Health & New Media Research

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming scholarly publishing, raising new ethical challenges for journals that address health and digital media. This editorial argues that Health & New Media Research requires a clear and explicit AI editorial policy to protect research integrity and public trust. Drawing on guidance from COPE, ICMJE, WAME, and major publishers, it summarizes the emerging consensus that AI tools cannot be authors, that their use must be transparently disclosed, and that humans remain fully accountable for all content. The editorial discusses both the potential benefits of generative AI, such as reducing language barriers and supporting research work-flows, and the associated risks, including hallucination, overgeneralization, fabricated citations, and new forms of misconduct. Special attention is given to the heightened risks of AI use in health-related communication and data-sensitive research. Core principles for authors are proposed, alongside practical guidance on responsible AI use. The editorial also outlines corresponding policy directions for editors and peer reviewers, emphasizing confidentiality and non-delegable human judgment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Health & New Media Research
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22720/hnmr.2025.00304
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generative artificial intelligence and editorial ethics: a roadmap for Health & New Media Research

Ghee Young Noh
Health & New Media Research
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Generative artificial intelligence and editorial ethics: a roadmap for Health & New Media Research

Ghee Young Noh
article en

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming scholarly publishing, raising new ethical challenges for journals that address health and digital media. This editorial argues that Health & New Media Research requires a clear and explicit AI editorial policy to protect research integrity and public trust. Drawing on guidance from COPE, ICMJE, WAME, and major publishers, it summarizes the emerging consensus that AI tools cannot be authors, that their use must be transparently disclosed, and that humans remain fully accountable for all content. The editorial discusses both the potential benefits of generative AI, such as reducing language barriers and supporting research work-flows, and the associated risks, including hallucination, overgeneralization, fabricated citations, and new forms of misconduct. Special attention is given to the heightened risks of AI use in health-related communication and data-sensitive research. Core principles for authors are proposed, alongside practical guidance on responsible AI use. The editorial also outlines corresponding policy directions for editors and peer reviewers, emphasizing confidentiality and non-delegable human judgment.

Health & New Media ResearchVol. 9(2)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Generative artificial intelligence and editorial ethics: a roadmap for Health & New Media Research — Ghee Young Noh · Health & New Media Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS