Concurrent systemic treatment during stereotactic radiosurgery for breast cancer brain metastasis: analysis of survival outcomes and propensity score matching analysis

Background: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has a fundamental role in the treatment of breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM). Current data on the matter comes from trials with brain metastases from any histology or with limited description on survival, focusing mostly on response rate. This retrospective study will assess the impact of SRS on survival and its interaction with systemic treatment (ST). Materials and methods: Charts from January 2011 to July 2022 were retrospectively assessed to investigate the relation between SRS and concurrent ST for BCBM. Since different protocols for ST can be offered, we divided our cohort and assessed the impact of different concurrent ST, in each subtype, on oncological survival outcomes. Results: There were 208 patients, 138 met inclusion criteria. Median follow-up was 10.7 months. Median overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), survival-free from CNS progression and survival-free from new neurological deficits were 12.5, 14.1, 16.2, and 16.3 months, respectively. For the whole cohort, any concurrent ST did not impact OS (p = 0.68). For hormone-positive patients, concurrent hormone therapy (HT) did not impact OS (p = 0.75). For those receiving anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor-type 2 (anti-HER-2) therapy there was no impact on OS (p = 0.47). Propensity score match analysis found that ST during SRS would reduce the chance of death by 19.4%. ST did not impact toxicities, chances of radionecrosis nor survival free of neurological symptoms. Conclusion: There has been an increase in research on the synergy between SRS and ST. In our study, this synergy was not sensible for oncological outcomes. New prospective research should focus more on survival outcomes than response rate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Reports of Practical Oncology & Radiotherapy
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5603/rpor.109849
Primary Topic
Brain Metastases and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Concurrent systemic treatment during stereotactic radiosurgery for breast cancer brain metastasis: analysis of survival outcomes and propensity score matching analysis

Eduardo Weltman, Silvia Radwanski Stuart, Leila Maria Da Róz, Vinícius de Carvalho Gico et al.
Reports of Practical Oncology & Radiotherapy
Brain Metastases and Treatment
article

Concurrent systemic treatment during stereotactic radiosurgery for breast cancer brain metastasis: analysis of survival outcomes and propensity score matching analysis

Eduardo Weltman, Silvia Radwanski Stuart, Leila Maria Da Róz, Vinícius de Carvalho Gico, Evandro César de Souza, Heloísa de Andrade Carvalho, Gabriel Faria Najas, Geovanne Pedro Mauro, Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo
article en

Abstract

Background: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has a fundamental role in the treatment of breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM). Current data on the matter comes from trials with brain metastases from any histology or with limited description on survival, focusing mostly on response rate. This retrospective study will assess the impact of SRS on survival and its interaction with systemic treatment (ST). Materials and methods: Charts from January 2011 to July 2022 were retrospectively assessed to investigate the relation between SRS and concurrent ST for BCBM. Since different protocols for ST can be offered, we divided our cohort and assessed the impact of different concurrent ST, in each subtype, on oncological survival outcomes. Results: There were 208 patients, 138 met inclusion criteria. Median follow-up was 10.7 months. Median overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), survival-free from CNS progression and survival-free from new neurological deficits were 12.5, 14.1, 16.2, and 16.3 months, respectively. For the whole cohort, any concurrent ST did not impact OS (p = 0.68). For hormone-positive patients, concurrent hormone therapy (HT) did not impact OS (p = 0.75). For those receiving anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor-type 2 (anti-HER-2) therapy there was no impact on OS (p = 0.47). Propensity score match analysis found that ST during SRS would reduce the chance of death by 19.4%. ST did not impact toxicities, chances of radionecrosis nor survival free of neurological symptoms. Conclusion: There has been an increase in research on the synergy between SRS and ST. In our study, this synergy was not sensible for oncological outcomes. New prospective research should focus more on survival outcomes than response rate.

Reports of Practical Oncology & RadiotherapyVol. 31(1)
Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (BR), Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Brain Metastases and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.