Assessing Pathways to Peace in West Papua: The Need for a Humanitarian Pause and Inclusive Dialogue

Almost all Indonesian peace policies in Papua—ranging from Special Autonomy and regional expansion to accelerated development and security operations—have failed to produce sustainable peace. This article argues that the persistent dominance of a security-centered approach has reproduced cycles of political violence, while non-violent alternatives, such as a humanitarian pause and dialogue with Papuan political representatives, have been systematically marginalized. Drawing on peacebuilding and conflict transformation perspectives, the article examines the escalation of violence in Papua since 2018 and its humanitarian consequences for indigenous Papuans. It contends that a humanitarian pause is essential to address civilian suffering and displacement, and that a Jakarta–Papua dialogue is necessary to negotiate a legitimate and inclusive framework for Papua’s political future within Indonesia. The article concludes by highlighting dialogue-based peacebuilding as a critical policy alternative for resolving one of the most protracted conflicts in the Asia–Pacific region.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
SUPRA Centre for Research and Publications
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71183/supra.2025020403
Primary Topic
Peacebuilding and International Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Pathways to Peace in West Papua: The Need for a Humanitarian Pause and Inclusive Dialogue

Cahyo Pamungkas
SUPRA Centre for Research and Publications
Peacebuilding and International Security
article

Assessing Pathways to Peace in West Papua: The Need for a Humanitarian Pause and Inclusive Dialogue

Cahyo Pamungkas
article en

Abstract

Almost all Indonesian peace policies in Papua—ranging from Special Autonomy and regional expansion to accelerated development and security operations—have failed to produce sustainable peace. This article argues that the persistent dominance of a security-centered approach has reproduced cycles of political violence, while non-violent alternatives, such as a humanitarian pause and dialogue with Papuan political representatives, have been systematically marginalized. Drawing on peacebuilding and conflict transformation perspectives, the article examines the escalation of violence in Papua since 2018 and its humanitarian consequences for indigenous Papuans. It contends that a humanitarian pause is essential to address civilian suffering and displacement, and that a Jakarta–Papua dialogue is necessary to negotiate a legitimate and inclusive framework for Papua’s political future within Indonesia. The article concludes by highlighting dialogue-based peacebuilding as a critical policy alternative for resolving one of the most protracted conflicts in the Asia–Pacific region.

SUPRA Centre for Research and PublicationsVol. 2(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Peacebuilding and International Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessing Pathways to Peace in West Papua: The Need for a Humanitarian Pause and Inclusive Dialogue — Cahyo Pamungkas · SUPRA Centre for Research and Publications (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS