How could steel industry decarbonisation benefit the global south?

Industrialised countries face legally binding decarbonisation commitments, but carbon pricing and capital subsidies have not overcome structural cost disadvantages for steel decarbonisation. Developing countries need decades of primary steel production for development, but cannot afford the green premium and cannot take the conventional carbon-intensive path. Hydrogen-based direct reduced iron technology changes what is possible: green iron production can now locate where costs are lowest. Some developing country locations offer substantial cost advantages. This article proposes a production chain configuration where industrialised country subsidies flow through contract structures to enable developing country production. EU steelmakers gain lower-cost inputs and enhanced competitiveness. EU public funders achieve decarbonisation at lower cost while building a competitive green steel industry. Developing country producers gain bankable offtake enabling investment otherwise inaccessible, with export partnerships providing the foundation for domestic green steel sectors. The configuration works within existing policy frameworks, requiring adjustment rather than new mechanisms. Implementation can proceed through first-mover partnerships rather than awaiting comprehensive international coordination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Technology Review for Carbon Neutrality
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26599/trcn.2025.9550016
Primary Topic
Iron and Steelmaking Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How could steel industry decarbonisation benefit the global south?

Hilton Lewis Trollip
Technology Review for Carbon Neutrality
Iron and Steelmaking Processes
article

How could steel industry decarbonisation benefit the global south?

Hilton Lewis Trollip
article en

Abstract

Industrialised countries face legally binding decarbonisation commitments, but carbon pricing and capital subsidies have not overcome structural cost disadvantages for steel decarbonisation. Developing countries need decades of primary steel production for development, but cannot afford the green premium and cannot take the conventional carbon-intensive path. Hydrogen-based direct reduced iron technology changes what is possible: green iron production can now locate where costs are lowest. Some developing country locations offer substantial cost advantages. This article proposes a production chain configuration where industrialised country subsidies flow through contract structures to enable developing country production. EU steelmakers gain lower-cost inputs and enhanced competitiveness. EU public funders achieve decarbonisation at lower cost while building a competitive green steel industry. Developing country producers gain bankable offtake enabling investment otherwise inaccessible, with export partnerships providing the foundation for domestic green steel sectors. The configuration works within existing policy frameworks, requiring adjustment rather than new mechanisms. Implementation can proceed through first-mover partnerships rather than awaiting comprehensive international coordination.

Technology Review for Carbon Neutrality
University of South Africa (ZA)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Iron and Steelmaking Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How could steel industry decarbonisation benefit the global south? — Hilton Lewis Trollip · Technology Review for Carbon Neutrality (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS