EU–ASEAN Green Bond Policies: A Legal Comparative Review and Their Implications for Sustainable Finance Development in ASEAN

Climate change presents an urgent and far-reaching global challenge, and current mitigation efforts remain insufficient to limit global temperature rise to the 1.5°C threshold set under the Paris Agreement. Although Southeast Asia contributes only modestly to global greenhouse gas emissions, the region faces disproportionately severe climate risks stemming from rapid population growth, accelerating industrialization, and continued dependence on fossil fuels. In this context, green finance—particularly the issuance of green bonds—has emerged as a pivotal instrument for mobilizing capital toward environmentally sustainable development and supporting the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The European Union has made notable progress in constructing a comprehensive and coherent regulatory framework for sustainable finance, exemplified by the EU Green Bond Standard, the EU Taxonomy, and related disclosure requirements. These mechanisms collectively enhance market integrity, promote investor confidence, and ensure the environmental credibility of financial instruments. By contrast, ASEAN member states confront persistent challenges, including regulatory fragmentation, limited institutional capacity, and underdeveloped legal infrastructures, which hinder the effective deployment and scaling of green bonds across the region. This article conducts a comparative legal and policy analysis of green bond frameworks in the EU and ASEAN, examining their respective regulatory architecture, implementation mechanisms, and degree of alignment with international standards. Through this comparison, the study identifies critical gaps within ASEAN’s regulatory landscape and highlights opportunities for strengthening sustainable finance governance. The article ultimately recommends the adoption of harmonized taxonomies, the formulation of coherent national policies, and the enhancement of regional cooperation as essential strategies for advancing a robust and credible green bond market in the ASEAN region.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Prophetic Law Review
Published
2025-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20885/plr.vol7.iss2.art4
Primary Topic
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EU–ASEAN Green Bond Policies: A Legal Comparative Review and Their Implications for Sustainable Finance Development in ASEAN

Vu Truc Hanh, Nguyen Phuong Dung
Prophetic Law Review
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
article

EU–ASEAN Green Bond Policies: A Legal Comparative Review and Their Implications for Sustainable Finance Development in ASEAN

Vu Truc Hanh, Nguyen Phuong Dung
article en

Abstract

Climate change presents an urgent and far-reaching global challenge, and current mitigation efforts remain insufficient to limit global temperature rise to the 1.5°C threshold set under the Paris Agreement. Although Southeast Asia contributes only modestly to global greenhouse gas emissions, the region faces disproportionately severe climate risks stemming from rapid population growth, accelerating industrialization, and continued dependence on fossil fuels. In this context, green finance—particularly the issuance of green bonds—has emerged as a pivotal instrument for mobilizing capital toward environmentally sustainable development and supporting the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The European Union has made notable progress in constructing a comprehensive and coherent regulatory framework for sustainable finance, exemplified by the EU Green Bond Standard, the EU Taxonomy, and related disclosure requirements. These mechanisms collectively enhance market integrity, promote investor confidence, and ensure the environmental credibility of financial instruments. By contrast, ASEAN member states confront persistent challenges, including regulatory fragmentation, limited institutional capacity, and underdeveloped legal infrastructures, which hinder the effective deployment and scaling of green bonds across the region. This article conducts a comparative legal and policy analysis of green bond frameworks in the EU and ASEAN, examining their respective regulatory architecture, implementation mechanisms, and degree of alignment with international standards. Through this comparison, the study identifies critical gaps within ASEAN’s regulatory landscape and highlights opportunities for strengthening sustainable finance governance. The article ultimately recommends the adoption of harmonized taxonomies, the formulation of coherent national policies, and the enhancement of regional cooperation as essential strategies for advancing a robust and credible green bond market in the ASEAN region.

Prophetic Law Review
Institute of Criminology (SI), Newcastle University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.