Dichotomous thinking: Its relationship with eating attitudes and fat phobia in pre-obese and obese adults

Dichotomous thinking may cause individuals to classify foods as "good" or "bad" by oversimplifying their thought processes. This study aims to examine the relationship between the Dichotomous Thinking Scale (DTS) and eating attitudes in pre-obese and obese adults, as well as to evaluate its impact on fat phobia. Participants completed a survey consisting of questions about their sociodemographic characteristics and nutritional habits, the Fat Phobia Scale (FPS), the Dichotomous Thinking in Eating Disorders Scale (DTEDS), the Eating Attitudes Test-26 (EAT-26), and a 3-day food consumption record (two weekdays and one weekend day). As the "Food" subfactor scores of the DTEDS increased, the "Diet" and "Oral Control" subfactor scores of the EAT-26 and the "Total EAT-26" scores also increased (<i>p</i> < 0.05). As the "General" subfactor scores of the DTEDS increased, the total scores of the FPS, the "Bulimia and Food Preoccupation" and "Oral Control" subfactor scores of the EAT-26, and the "Total EAT-26" scores also increased (<i>p</i> < 0.05). As the "Total DTEDS" scores increased, the "Diet," "Bulimia and Food Preoccupation," and "Oral Control" subfactor scores of the EAT-26 and the "Total EAT-26" scores also increased (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Dichotomous thinking has been found to be significantly associated with eating attitudes and fat phobia and increases eating attitudes and fat phobia. However, dichotomous thinking has no significant effect on the total scores of the EAT-26 and FPS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrition and Health
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02601060251411111
Primary Topic
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dichotomous thinking: Its relationship with eating attitudes and fat phobia in pre-obese and obese adults

Müge Arslan, Sena Özel
Nutrition and Health
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
article

Dichotomous thinking: Its relationship with eating attitudes and fat phobia in pre-obese and obese adults

Müge Arslan, Sena Özel
article en

Abstract

Dichotomous thinking may cause individuals to classify foods as "good" or "bad" by oversimplifying their thought processes. This study aims to examine the relationship between the Dichotomous Thinking Scale (DTS) and eating attitudes in pre-obese and obese adults, as well as to evaluate its impact on fat phobia. Participants completed a survey consisting of questions about their sociodemographic characteristics and nutritional habits, the Fat Phobia Scale (FPS), the Dichotomous Thinking in Eating Disorders Scale (DTEDS), the Eating Attitudes Test-26 (EAT-26), and a 3-day food consumption record (two weekdays and one weekend day). As the "Food" subfactor scores of the DTEDS increased, the "Diet" and "Oral Control" subfactor scores of the EAT-26 and the "Total EAT-26" scores also increased (<i>p</i> < 0.05). As the "General" subfactor scores of the DTEDS increased, the total scores of the FPS, the "Bulimia and Food Preoccupation" and "Oral Control" subfactor scores of the EAT-26, and the "Total EAT-26" scores also increased (<i>p</i> < 0.05). As the "Total DTEDS" scores increased, the "Diet," "Bulimia and Food Preoccupation," and "Oral Control" subfactor scores of the EAT-26 and the "Total EAT-26" scores also increased (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Dichotomous thinking has been found to be significantly associated with eating attitudes and fat phobia and increases eating attitudes and fat phobia. However, dichotomous thinking has no significant effect on the total scores of the EAT-26 and FPS.

Nutrition and Health
Bridge University (SS), Amasya Üniversitesi (TR)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.