Rethinking “religion” and “science” to cultivate mutual trust in the United States

In many Western societies such as the United States, "science" is considered a polarizing and controversial topic along political and religious lines. Although religious and politically conservative individuals are generally less trusting of science than non-religious and politically liberal individuals, we argue that there are more nuances to religion, science, and the religion-science relationship than is typically assumed. Stereotyping religious individuals as "anti-science" and scientists as "anti-religion" is both inaccurate and has the potential to exacerbate divisions between religious and scientific communities. By contrast, addressing misconceptions about who most religious people are and what they tend to believe, as well as who scientists are and what "science" entails, may cultivate both public trust in science and scientists' willingness to welcome multiple identities and perspectives among their ranks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Opinion in Psychology
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102254
Primary Topic
Evolution and Science Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking “religion” and “science” to cultivate mutual trust in the United States

Kimberly Rios, Cameron D. Mackey
Current Opinion in Psychology
Evolution and Science Education
article

Rethinking “religion” and “science” to cultivate mutual trust in the United States

Kimberly Rios, Cameron D. Mackey
article en

Abstract

In many Western societies such as the United States, "science" is considered a polarizing and controversial topic along political and religious lines. Although religious and politically conservative individuals are generally less trusting of science than non-religious and politically liberal individuals, we argue that there are more nuances to religion, science, and the religion-science relationship than is typically assumed. Stereotyping religious individuals as "anti-science" and scientists as "anti-religion" is both inaccurate and has the potential to exacerbate divisions between religious and scientific communities. By contrast, addressing misconceptions about who most religious people are and what they tend to believe, as well as who scientists are and what "science" entails, may cultivate both public trust in science and scientists' willingness to welcome multiple identities and perspectives among their ranks.

Current Opinion in PsychologyVol. 68
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Evolution and Science Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.