Comparative Study between General Anaesthesia and Thoracic Segmental Spinal Anaesthesia for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy- A Prospective Randomised Open Label Study At A Tertiary Care Hospital

Abstract Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is preferred for its minimally invasive benefits, like less pain and quicker recovery. However, managing anaesthesia can be complex due to the effects of pneumoperitoneum. While GA is standard, TSSA offers a promising alternative for patients with comorbidities. This study compares GA and TSSA using isobaric ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine to assess patient outcomes. Methods: This study was conducted at Government Medical College, Jammu, India, from August 1, 2023, to July 31, 2024, involving 90 ASA patients aged 18–60 undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. They were divided into Group T (n=45, TSSA with 0.75% ropivacaine + 10 µg dexmedetomidine) and Group G (n=45, GA). Data on demographics, hemodynamic, postoperative pain (VAS), satisfaction scores, and discharge times were collected. Statistical analysis included t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and chi-square tests, with P < 0.05 considered significant. Results: Demographic characteristics were similar (age: 34.67 ± 11.9 vs. 38.73 ± 11.29 years, P = 0.103595). Surgical duration was comparable (67.3 ± 8.79 vs. 68.6 ± 10.05 min, P > 0.253). Group T had higher rates of hypotension (20% vs. 2%, P < 0.005) and bradycardia (18% vs. 2%, P < 0.005), as well as greater fluid needs (2317.03 ± 465.06 vs. 1455.18 ± 295.62 mL, P < 0.0001). Postoperative VAS scores were lower in Group T (1.98 ± 1.34 vs. 2.93 ± 1.9 at 4h, P = 0.007794), with higher patient satisfaction (3.91 ± 1.15 vs. 3.49 ± 1.09, P = 0.03321), while surgeon satisfaction favoured GA (3.07 ± 0.61 vs. 3.87 ± 0.83, P = 0.00321). Conclusion: TSSA outperforms GA in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, offering better pain control, higher patient satisfaction, and faster discharge, while maintaining manageable hemodynamic effects. It is safe for patients with respiratory issues like COPD and deserves further research for broader application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18084412
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study between General Anaesthesia and Thoracic Segmental Spinal Anaesthesia for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy- A Prospective Randomised Open Label Study At A Tertiary Care Hospital

International Journal of Medical Science and Innovative Research (IJMSIR)
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Comparative Study between General Anaesthesia and Thoracic Segmental Spinal Anaesthesia for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy- A Prospective Randomised Open Label Study At A Tertiary Care Hospital

International Journal of Medical Science and Innovative Research (IJMSIR)
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is preferred for its minimally invasive benefits, like less pain and quicker recovery. However, managing anaesthesia can be complex due to the effects of pneumoperitoneum. While GA is standard, TSSA offers a promising alternative for patients with comorbidities. This study compares GA and TSSA using isobaric ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine to assess patient outcomes. Methods: This study was conducted at Government Medical College, Jammu, India, from August 1, 2023, to July 31, 2024, involving 90 ASA patients aged 18–60 undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. They were divided into Group T (n=45, TSSA with 0.75% ropivacaine + 10 µg dexmedetomidine) and Group G (n=45, GA). Data on demographics, hemodynamic, postoperative pain (VAS), satisfaction scores, and discharge times were collected. Statistical analysis included t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and chi-square tests, with P < 0.05 considered significant. Results: Demographic characteristics were similar (age: 34.67 ± 11.9 vs. 38.73 ± 11.29 years, P = 0.103595). Surgical duration was comparable (67.3 ± 8.79 vs. 68.6 ± 10.05 min, P > 0.253). Group T had higher rates of hypotension (20% vs. 2%, P < 0.005) and bradycardia (18% vs. 2%, P < 0.005), as well as greater fluid needs (2317.03 ± 465.06 vs. 1455.18 ± 295.62 mL, P < 0.0001). Postoperative VAS scores were lower in Group T (1.98 ± 1.34 vs. 2.93 ± 1.9 at 4h, P = 0.007794), with higher patient satisfaction (3.91 ± 1.15 vs. 3.49 ± 1.09, P = 0.03321), while surgeon satisfaction favoured GA (3.07 ± 0.61 vs. 3.87 ± 0.83, P = 0.00321). Conclusion: TSSA outperforms GA in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, offering better pain control, higher patient satisfaction, and faster discharge, while maintaining manageable hemodynamic effects. It is safe for patients with respiratory issues like COPD and deserves further research for broader application.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Innovative Research (United States) (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.