COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM ALGORITHMS FOR SOLVING LINEAR SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS: THEORETICAL INSIGHTS AND BENCHMARKING CHALLENGES

Modern computers utilize a model based on a simple Turing machine concept. This study contains an extensive comparative review of classical and quantum algorithm approaches to solving a system of linear equations. The study details standard classical approaches like Gaussian Elimination or Conjugate Gradient Method and compares these with the algorithm of quantum theory algorithm HHL (Harrow-Hassidim-Lloyd). It considers the logic behind each of them, their benchmarks, scalability, implementation difficulties and practical use. Benchmarking results illustrate the fact that a classical approach continues to do especially good for small to moderate sized problems. However, quantum computation has the potential for an exponential speedup using algorithms like HHL in well-conditioned sparse matrices. The current limits of the hardware are discussed and future research directions needed to be able to utilize quantum computing for larger scale linear algebra problems are presented.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18090655
Primary Topic
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM ALGORITHMS FOR SOLVING LINEAR SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS: THEORETICAL INSIGHTS AND BENCHMARKING CHALLENGES

Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
article

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM ALGORITHMS FOR SOLVING LINEAR SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS: THEORETICAL INSIGHTS AND BENCHMARKING CHALLENGES

Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology
article en

Abstract

Modern computers utilize a model based on a simple Turing machine concept. This study contains an extensive comparative review of classical and quantum algorithm approaches to solving a system of linear equations. The study details standard classical approaches like Gaussian Elimination or Conjugate Gradient Method and compares these with the algorithm of quantum theory algorithm HHL (Harrow-Hassidim-Lloyd). It considers the logic behind each of them, their benchmarks, scalability, implementation difficulties and practical use. Benchmarking results illustrate the fact that a classical approach continues to do especially good for small to moderate sized problems. However, quantum computation has the potential for an exponential speedup using algorithms like HHL in well-conditioned sparse matrices. The current limits of the hardware are discussed and future research directions needed to be able to utilize quantum computing for larger scale linear algebra problems are presented.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM ALGORITHMS FOR SOLVING LINEAR SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS: THEORETICAL INSIGHTS AND BENCHMARKING CHALLENGES — Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS