Are the Foundational Guidelines Endorsing Isometric Resistance Training (IRT) as a Blood Pressure-Lowering Intervention Being Cited Within the IRT Literature? A Scoping Review

Isometric resistance training is endorsed in global blood pressure management guidelines, but not yet routinely prescribed in clinical practice. A lack of health care provider awareness of its recommendation by governing bodies may be a contributing factor. Citing the guidelines within the isometric resistance training scientific literature is an important step in promoting its prescription. This scoping review quantified the extent to which guidelines put forth by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and Exercise and Sport Science Australia, two of the most descriptive guidelines endorsing isometric resistance training as a blood pressure-lowering tool, were cited. Searches were conducted in OVID Medline, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systemic Reviews, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, and ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health. Eligible sources were those published in English between November 2017 and December 2023, which referred to the use of isometric resistance training for hypertension prevention and/or management and cited at least one guideline. Extracted data was tabulated and frequency counts performed. Forty-nine articles met the inclusion criteria, 16% of which cited the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines, and 3% the Exercise and Sport Science Australia guidelines. Less than 50% of the identified sources linked isometric resistance training overtly to the guidelines. Increasing awareness by citing these guidelines within the IRT scientific literature may help promote its use by health care providers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1615/critrevphysrehabilmed.2025061075
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are the Foundational Guidelines Endorsing Isometric Resistance Training (IRT) as a Blood Pressure-Lowering Intervention Being Cited Within the IRT Literature? A Scoping Review

Jared Jeffrey Richards, Cheri L. McGowan, Adam Mulcaster, Anne McGowan et al.
Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
article

Are the Foundational Guidelines Endorsing Isometric Resistance Training (IRT) as a Blood Pressure-Lowering Intervention Being Cited Within the IRT Literature? A Scoping Review

Jared Jeffrey Richards, Cheri L. McGowan, Adam Mulcaster, Anne McGowan, NELLIE BORDIGNON, Megan Bornais, Avery Jones, Thuy Trang Nguyen, Cayla Brush
article en

Abstract

Isometric resistance training is endorsed in global blood pressure management guidelines, but not yet routinely prescribed in clinical practice. A lack of health care provider awareness of its recommendation by governing bodies may be a contributing factor. Citing the guidelines within the isometric resistance training scientific literature is an important step in promoting its prescription. This scoping review quantified the extent to which guidelines put forth by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and Exercise and Sport Science Australia, two of the most descriptive guidelines endorsing isometric resistance training as a blood pressure-lowering tool, were cited. Searches were conducted in OVID Medline, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systemic Reviews, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, and ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health. Eligible sources were those published in English between November 2017 and December 2023, which referred to the use of isometric resistance training for hypertension prevention and/or management and cited at least one guideline. Extracted data was tabulated and frequency counts performed. Forty-nine articles met the inclusion criteria, 16% of which cited the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines, and 3% the Exercise and Sport Science Australia guidelines. Less than 50% of the identified sources linked isometric resistance training overtly to the guidelines. Increasing awareness by citing these guidelines within the IRT scientific literature may help promote its use by health care providers.

Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation MedicineVol. 38(1)
University of Windsor (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.