Comparative analysis of methods for identifying tree structures of coronary vessels

The paper presents a comparative analysis of the performance of machine learning models and one filter method used for semantic segmentation of the coronary vessels based on the source coronary angiographic image. Seven machine learning models were tested: UNet3+, AngioNet, Reg-SA-UNet++, EfficientUNet++ B5, SE-RegUNet 4GF, SE-RegUNet 16GF, FR-UNet and one filter method, which was implemented as part of the paper. Despite the impossibility of determining the exact hierarchy of model performance, based on the results of statistical tests, the model that presented the best results with accuracy of 97,7% was distinguished – FR-UNet and the model that showed the lowest quality – UNet3+.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computer Sciences Institute
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.7942
Primary Topic
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of methods for identifying tree structures of coronary vessels

Małgorzata Charytanowicz, Kacper Liżewski
Journal of Computer Sciences Institute
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
article

Comparative analysis of methods for identifying tree structures of coronary vessels

Małgorzata Charytanowicz, Kacper Liżewski
article en

Abstract

The paper presents a comparative analysis of the performance of machine learning models and one filter method used for semantic segmentation of the coronary vessels based on the source coronary angiographic image. Seven machine learning models were tested: UNet3+, AngioNet, Reg-SA-UNet++, EfficientUNet++ B5, SE-RegUNet 4GF, SE-RegUNet 16GF, FR-UNet and one filter method, which was implemented as part of the paper. Despite the impossibility of determining the exact hierarchy of model performance, based on the results of statistical tests, the model that presented the best results with accuracy of 97,7% was distinguished – FR-UNet and the model that showed the lowest quality – UNet3+.

Journal of Computer Sciences InstituteVol. 37
Lublin University of Technology (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.