Road Users' Behavior and Perceptions of Autonomous Vehicles with External Human-Machine Interfaces: a Review of Developments in 2017–2024

The successful deployment of autonomous vehicles (AVs) relies heavily on their ability to interact safely and effectively with other road users. External human-machine interfaces (eHMIs) have emerged as critical components in facilitating these interactions. Rigorous evaluation and testing of eHMIs are essential for realizing their intended safety and communication benefits. This study provides a comprehensive review of current eHMI research, focusing on their impact on road users' behavior and perceptions, as well as the methods used for evaluation. Key behavioral factors-such as eHMI modality, information type, location, vehicle kinematics, traffic environment, and user characteristics-are systematically reviewed and summarized. The influence of eHMIs on user perceptions is also explored through indicators such as perceived safety, comprehensibility, trust, cognitive load, and user experience. Despite notable advancements, several critical research gaps remain underexplored. Most studies focus on one-to-one interactions, neglecting the complexities of mixed-traffic environments involving AVs, conventional human-driven vehicles, pedestrians, and cyclists. Current evaluation methods largely rely on virtual reality and Wizard-of-Oz experiments, which may fail to fully capture real-world dynamics. Additionally, subjective questionnaires, which are often used in these studies, do not guarantee high reproducibility of findings. Moreover, insufficient attention has been given to the synchronization of eHMI signals with vehicle kinematics. Furthermore, the absence of standardized evaluation frameworks limits cross-study comparability and the development of universally applicable eHMI solutions. To address these challenges, future research should prioritize the integration of naturalistic traffic scenarios, the adoption of objective and reproducible evaluation methods, the exploration of multimodal eHMI designs, and the development of standardized assessment protocols. These efforts are crucial for improving AV communication with diverse road users and ensuring safety in increasingly complex traffic ecosystems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Intelligent and Connected Vehicles
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26599/jicv.2026.9210068
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Road Users' Behavior and Perceptions of Autonomous Vehicles with External Human-Machine Interfaces: a Review of Developments in 2017–2024

Xiaofan Xue, Tianpei Tang, Hua Wang, Shengnan Zhao et al.
1 citations
Journal of Intelligent and Connected Vehicles
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
2.44
article

Road Users' Behavior and Perceptions of Autonomous Vehicles with External Human-Machine Interfaces: a Review of Developments in 2017–2024

Xiaofan Xue, Tianpei Tang, Hua Wang, Shengnan Zhao, Bang Luo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The successful deployment of autonomous vehicles (AVs) relies heavily on their ability to interact safely and effectively with other road users. External human-machine interfaces (eHMIs) have emerged as critical components in facilitating these interactions. Rigorous evaluation and testing of eHMIs are essential for realizing their intended safety and communication benefits. This study provides a comprehensive review of current eHMI research, focusing on their impact on road users' behavior and perceptions, as well as the methods used for evaluation. Key behavioral factors-such as eHMI modality, information type, location, vehicle kinematics, traffic environment, and user characteristics-are systematically reviewed and summarized. The influence of eHMIs on user perceptions is also explored through indicators such as perceived safety, comprehensibility, trust, cognitive load, and user experience. Despite notable advancements, several critical research gaps remain underexplored. Most studies focus on one-to-one interactions, neglecting the complexities of mixed-traffic environments involving AVs, conventional human-driven vehicles, pedestrians, and cyclists. Current evaluation methods largely rely on virtual reality and Wizard-of-Oz experiments, which may fail to fully capture real-world dynamics. Additionally, subjective questionnaires, which are often used in these studies, do not guarantee high reproducibility of findings. Moreover, insufficient attention has been given to the synchronization of eHMI signals with vehicle kinematics. Furthermore, the absence of standardized evaluation frameworks limits cross-study comparability and the development of universally applicable eHMI solutions. To address these challenges, future research should prioritize the integration of naturalistic traffic scenarios, the adoption of objective and reproducible evaluation methods, the exploration of multimodal eHMI designs, and the development of standardized assessment protocols. These efforts are crucial for improving AV communication with diverse road users and ensuring safety in increasingly complex traffic ecosystems.

Journal of Intelligent and Connected VehiclesVol. 8(4)
Hefei University of Technology (CN), Nantong University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.