SPEECH/ACT

As a language play, SPEECH/ACT is a piece of performative writing (and writing for performance) exploring linguistic performativity. It personifies speech and action to stage a dialogue playfully testing the limits of J. L. Austin’s famous claim in How to Do Things with Words (1955) that performative utterances cannot be “felicitous” within the theatre. As the character ACT contentiously notes in a footnote to Act III: “Though Austin famously asserted that theatrical utterances are necessarily ‘hollow’ or ‘void’ as performatives, this notion has been vigorously contested by theatre and performance theorists for half a century.” My text’s humorous yet melancholic meditation on hollowness, emptiness, and the void—in relation to speech acts and linguistic performativity in particular, but also climate change and existential dread more broadly—moves across stylistic, tonal, affective, and structural registers to test the edges of narrative description and performative action. In the indicative, imperative, and subjunctive moods, my script grammatically and syntactically stages speech and action as ambivalently entwined amidst a backdrop of continuously shifting theatrical, poetic, and philosophical contexts. Ultimately, it invites the reader to contemplate the criteria for “felicitous” performative utterances within a dematerialized theatre of the mind.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Performance Philosophy
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21476/pp.2025.101520
Primary Topic
Theatre and Performance Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SPEECH/ACT

Katie Schaag
Performance Philosophy
Theatre and Performance Studies
article

SPEECH/ACT

Katie Schaag
article en

Abstract

As a language play, SPEECH/ACT is a piece of performative writing (and writing for performance) exploring linguistic performativity. It personifies speech and action to stage a dialogue playfully testing the limits of J. L. Austin’s famous claim in How to Do Things with Words (1955) that performative utterances cannot be “felicitous” within the theatre. As the character ACT contentiously notes in a footnote to Act III: “Though Austin famously asserted that theatrical utterances are necessarily ‘hollow’ or ‘void’ as performatives, this notion has been vigorously contested by theatre and performance theorists for half a century.” My text’s humorous yet melancholic meditation on hollowness, emptiness, and the void—in relation to speech acts and linguistic performativity in particular, but also climate change and existential dread more broadly—moves across stylistic, tonal, affective, and structural registers to test the edges of narrative description and performative action. In the indicative, imperative, and subjunctive moods, my script grammatically and syntactically stages speech and action as ambivalently entwined amidst a backdrop of continuously shifting theatrical, poetic, and philosophical contexts. Ultimately, it invites the reader to contemplate the criteria for “felicitous” performative utterances within a dematerialized theatre of the mind.

Performance PhilosophyVol. 10(1)
Spelman College (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Theatre and Performance Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.