A Principle-Based Prioritization Approach in Istanbul’s Transportation System

This study proposes a holistic, principle-based approach to Istanbul’s transportation problems instead of fragmented solutions. A three-stage analytical methodology was developed to evaluate Istanbul’s transportation system from a principle-oriented perspective. In the first stage, 12 principles shaped by a sense of stewardship were identified based on current literature and expert insights. These principles were grouped under four thematic pillars and prioritized using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). In the second stage, the current transportation policies of the Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality (IMM) were evaluated by experts. These evaluations were then clustered using the K-Means method, and the resulting clusters were interpreted to prioritize the identified problem areas. In the final stage, strategic documents and project proposals were assessed through a principle-alignment analysis and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method, respectively. In this way, the strategies and projects most closely aligned with the identified principles were systematically revealed. By integrating qualitative and quantitative analyses (expert judgments, AHP, K-Means, TOPSIS) within a mixed-methods framework, the research aims to provide decision-makers with a viable and objective basis for transportation policy development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mimarlık Bilimleri ve Uygulamaları Dergisi (MBUD)
Published
2025-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1758244
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Principle-Based Prioritization Approach in Istanbul’s Transportation System

Abdullah Demi̇r
Mimarlık Bilimleri ve Uygulamaları Dergisi (MBUD)
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
article

A Principle-Based Prioritization Approach in Istanbul’s Transportation System

Abdullah Demi̇r
article en

Abstract

This study proposes a holistic, principle-based approach to Istanbul’s transportation problems instead of fragmented solutions. A three-stage analytical methodology was developed to evaluate Istanbul’s transportation system from a principle-oriented perspective. In the first stage, 12 principles shaped by a sense of stewardship were identified based on current literature and expert insights. These principles were grouped under four thematic pillars and prioritized using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). In the second stage, the current transportation policies of the Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality (IMM) were evaluated by experts. These evaluations were then clustered using the K-Means method, and the resulting clusters were interpreted to prioritize the identified problem areas. In the final stage, strategic documents and project proposals were assessed through a principle-alignment analysis and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method, respectively. In this way, the strategies and projects most closely aligned with the identified principles were systematically revealed. By integrating qualitative and quantitative analyses (expert judgments, AHP, K-Means, TOPSIS) within a mixed-methods framework, the research aims to provide decision-makers with a viable and objective basis for transportation policy development.

Mimarlık Bilimleri ve Uygulamaları Dergisi (MBUD)Vol. 10(2)
Marmara University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.