A survey to measure cognitive biases in mobility choices and responses to urban policy

Recent urban policies are trying to encourage soft mobility, yet observations show an inertia or a slow evolution: people tend to still stick to the individual car despite policies inciting them to switch to other modes. We suggest that this can be explained by cognitive biases influencing the perceptions of the different mobility modes. In this paper, we describe a survey about the perceptions of 4 mobility modes (car, bus, bicycle, walking) and the preferences of users for 6 modal choice factors. This survey has gathered 650 answers in 2023, that are published as open data. In this study, we analyse these answers to highlight the influence of 3 cognitive biases on mobility decisions: halo bias, choice-supportive bias, and reactance. Our results support the hypothesis that cognitive biases are a plausible explanation to the (lack of) response to urban policies. Our biased decision model and collected data can serve several purposes. It can be used to initialise a virtual population with realistic attributes, and simulate their mobility decisions in reaction to various urban policies. The decision model can also be implemented in interactive simulators to illustrate the impact of cognitive biases on decisions. Work is also ongoing to design a simulation-based serious game where the player takes the role of an urban manager faced with planning choices to make their city more sustainable. • Describe a model of mobility choice based on 6 decision factors. • Present the methodology of a survey to measure users’ preferences for these factors, as well as their perceptions of how 4 mobility modes (car, bus, walk, bicycle) fill these criteria. • Discuss the results of this survey, that gathered 650 answers, and are published as open data. • Analyse these results to highlight the influence of 3 cognitive biases in mobility decisions: halo, choice-supportive bias, and reactance. • Show how this model and data can be used as a basis for a simulator aimed at predicting modification of the modal distribution in a town in reaction to urban policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transport Policy
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.103988
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A survey to measure cognitive biases in mobility choices and responses to urban policy

Carole Adam
Transport Policy
Urban Transport and Accessibility
article

A survey to measure cognitive biases in mobility choices and responses to urban policy

Carole Adam
article en

Abstract

Recent urban policies are trying to encourage soft mobility, yet observations show an inertia or a slow evolution: people tend to still stick to the individual car despite policies inciting them to switch to other modes. We suggest that this can be explained by cognitive biases influencing the perceptions of the different mobility modes. In this paper, we describe a survey about the perceptions of 4 mobility modes (car, bus, bicycle, walking) and the preferences of users for 6 modal choice factors. This survey has gathered 650 answers in 2023, that are published as open data. In this study, we analyse these answers to highlight the influence of 3 cognitive biases on mobility decisions: halo bias, choice-supportive bias, and reactance. Our results support the hypothesis that cognitive biases are a plausible explanation to the (lack of) response to urban policies. Our biased decision model and collected data can serve several purposes. It can be used to initialise a virtual population with realistic attributes, and simulate their mobility decisions in reaction to various urban policies. The decision model can also be implemented in interactive simulators to illustrate the impact of cognitive biases on decisions. Work is also ongoing to design a simulation-based serious game where the player takes the role of an urban manager faced with planning choices to make their city more sustainable. • Describe a model of mobility choice based on 6 decision factors. • Present the methodology of a survey to measure users’ preferences for these factors, as well as their perceptions of how 4 mobility modes (car, bus, walk, bicycle) fill these criteria. • Discuss the results of this survey, that gathered 650 answers, and are published as open data. • Analyse these results to highlight the influence of 3 cognitive biases in mobility decisions: halo, choice-supportive bias, and reactance. • Show how this model and data can be used as a basis for a simulator aimed at predicting modification of the modal distribution in a town in reaction to urban policies.

Transport PolicyVol. 179
Laboratoire d'Informatique de Grenoble (FR), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.