The Nondilated Left Ventricular Cardiomyopathy Phenotype: Arrhythmic Prognosis and Differences With Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Nondilated left ventricular cardiomyopathy (NDLVC) has emerged as a new entity within the spectrum of nonischemic cardiomyopathies, characterized by impaired left ventricular (LV) systolic function in the absence of LV dilatation. This study aimed to compare baseline differences in characteristics between NDLVC and dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), and to identify predictors of heart failure (HF) and sustained ventricular arrhythmias (VA) (VT/VF) hospitalization within the NDLVC subgroup. Patients with both DCM and NDLVC were eligible in this prospective observational cohort, with diagnostic classification being performed via cardiac magnetic resonance-derived volumes. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify differences in baseline characteristics and indices associated with HF and VA hospitalization. There were 122 patients in the study (NDLVC [n = 60], DCM [n = 62]). Compared to DCM, NDLVC patients had significantly smaller left-ventricular end-diastolic volume index (91 vs 103 ml/m², p = 0.015), shorter QRS duration (104 vs 115 ms, p = 0.02), and were more often in New York Heart Association class I (70% vs 45%, p = 0.004). In multivariable models, the NDLVC phenotype was independently associated with late potentials (odds ratio [OR] 2.82, 95% confidence intervals [CI] [1.25,6.69], p = 0.015), lower left-ventricular end-diastolic volume index (OR 0.97, 95% CI [0.95,0.99], p = 0.005), and shorter QTc (OR 0.98, 95% CI [0.96,0.99], p < 0.001). Among NDLVC patients and after a median follow-up of 41 months, 6/60 (10%) experienced HF, and 10/60 (17%) VA hospitalization. In multivariable models, HF hospitalization was associated with worse New York Heart Association class (OR 19.9, 95% CI [2.14,108.9] p = 0.006), reduced right ventricular ejection fraction (OR 0.81, 95% CI [0.60,0.95] p = 0.006), and lower indexed right-ventricular end-diastolic volume (OR 0.87, 95% CI [0.71,0.98] p = 0.014). VA hospitalization was independently associated with premature ventricular complexes >1,000/24 hours (OR=20.1, 95% CI [2.66,336], p = 0.002), right ventricular ejection fraction ≤45% (OR 0.85, 95% CI [0.71,0.96], p = 0.008) and prolonged QTc (OR 1.06, 95% CI [1.01,1.12], p = 0.005). In conclusion, NDLVC represents a distinct cardiomyopathy phenotype with preserved LV geometry and favorable functional status compared to DCM, yet a significant subset remains at-risk for adverse events, particularly VA. RV dysfunction and arrhythmic burden are key risk markers in NDLVC and warrant focused monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Cardiology
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.12.017
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Nondilated Left Ventricular Cardiomyopathy Phenotype: Arrhythmic Prognosis and Differences With Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Stefanos Archontakis, Ioannis Leontsinis, Konstantinos Gatzoulis, Nikolaos Ktenopoulos et al.
The American Journal of Cardiology
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
article

The Nondilated Left Ventricular Cardiomyopathy Phenotype: Arrhythmic Prognosis and Differences With Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Stefanos Archontakis, Ioannis Leontsinis, Konstantinos Gatzoulis, Nikolaos Ktenopoulos, Skevos Sideris, Zoi Sotiriou, Konstantinos P Tsioufis, Nikias Milaras, Konstantinos Pamporis, Panagiotis Dourvas, Alexandros Kasiakogias, Paschalis Karakasis, Konstantinos Toutouzas, Charalambos Vlachopoulos
article en

Abstract

Nondilated left ventricular cardiomyopathy (NDLVC) has emerged as a new entity within the spectrum of nonischemic cardiomyopathies, characterized by impaired left ventricular (LV) systolic function in the absence of LV dilatation. This study aimed to compare baseline differences in characteristics between NDLVC and dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), and to identify predictors of heart failure (HF) and sustained ventricular arrhythmias (VA) (VT/VF) hospitalization within the NDLVC subgroup. Patients with both DCM and NDLVC were eligible in this prospective observational cohort, with diagnostic classification being performed via cardiac magnetic resonance-derived volumes. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify differences in baseline characteristics and indices associated with HF and VA hospitalization. There were 122 patients in the study (NDLVC [n = 60], DCM [n = 62]). Compared to DCM, NDLVC patients had significantly smaller left-ventricular end-diastolic volume index (91 vs 103 ml/m², p = 0.015), shorter QRS duration (104 vs 115 ms, p = 0.02), and were more often in New York Heart Association class I (70% vs 45%, p = 0.004). In multivariable models, the NDLVC phenotype was independently associated with late potentials (odds ratio [OR] 2.82, 95% confidence intervals [CI] [1.25,6.69], p = 0.015), lower left-ventricular end-diastolic volume index (OR 0.97, 95% CI [0.95,0.99], p = 0.005), and shorter QTc (OR 0.98, 95% CI [0.96,0.99], p < 0.001). Among NDLVC patients and after a median follow-up of 41 months, 6/60 (10%) experienced HF, and 10/60 (17%) VA hospitalization. In multivariable models, HF hospitalization was associated with worse New York Heart Association class (OR 19.9, 95% CI [2.14,108.9] p = 0.006), reduced right ventricular ejection fraction (OR 0.81, 95% CI [0.60,0.95] p = 0.006), and lower indexed right-ventricular end-diastolic volume (OR 0.87, 95% CI [0.71,0.98] p = 0.014). VA hospitalization was independently associated with premature ventricular complexes >1,000/24 hours (OR=20.1, 95% CI [2.66,336], p = 0.002), right ventricular ejection fraction ≤45% (OR 0.85, 95% CI [0.71,0.96], p = 0.008) and prolonged QTc (OR 1.06, 95% CI [1.01,1.12], p = 0.005). In conclusion, NDLVC represents a distinct cardiomyopathy phenotype with preserved LV geometry and favorable functional status compared to DCM, yet a significant subset remains at-risk for adverse events, particularly VA. RV dysfunction and arrhythmic burden are key risk markers in NDLVC and warrant focused monitoring.

The American Journal of CardiologyVol. 262
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR), Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR), Hippocration General Hospital (GR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.