AI agents for photonic integrated circuit design automation

We present photonics intelligent design and optimization, a proof-of-concept multi-agent framework that converts natural-language photonic integrated circuit (PIC) design requests into layout mask files. This work demonstrates end-to-end PIC design automation using large language models (LLMs), with the goal of achieving structurally valid rather than performance-qualified layouts. We compare seven reasoning LLMs using a testbench of 102 design descriptions that ranged from single devices to 112-component PICs. The success rate for single-device designs was up to 91%. For design queries with ≤15 components, o1, Gemini-2.5-pro, and Claude Opus 4 achieved the highest end-to-end pass@5 success rates of ∼57%, with Gemini-2.5-pro requiring the fewest output tokens and the lowest cost. Future work will extend this framework toward performance qualification through expanded datasets, tighter simulation and optimization loops, and fabrication feedback integration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
APL Machine Learning
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0300741
Primary Topic
Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI agents for photonic integrated circuit design automation

A. Surjalal Sharma, Yuqi Fu, Vahid Ansari, Dirk Englund et al.
APL Machine Learning
Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing
article

AI agents for photonic integrated circuit design automation

A. Surjalal Sharma, Yuqi Fu, Vahid Ansari, Dirk Englund, J. Matres, Salahuddin Ahmad, Joyce K. S. Poon, Kashish Mistry, Rajiv Iyer, Fiona Kuang, Raisa Islam Aishy
article en

Abstract

We present photonics intelligent design and optimization, a proof-of-concept multi-agent framework that converts natural-language photonic integrated circuit (PIC) design requests into layout mask files. This work demonstrates end-to-end PIC design automation using large language models (LLMs), with the goal of achieving structurally valid rather than performance-qualified layouts. We compare seven reasoning LLMs using a testbench of 102 design descriptions that ranged from single devices to 112-component PICs. The success rate for single-device designs was up to 91%. For design queries with ≤15 components, o1, Gemini-2.5-pro, and Claude Opus 4 achieved the highest end-to-end pass@5 success rates of ∼57%, with Gemini-2.5-pro requiring the fewest output tokens and the lowest cost. Future work will extend this framework toward performance qualification through expanded datasets, tighter simulation and optimization loops, and fabrication feedback integration.

APL Machine LearningVol. 3(4)
Massachusetts Department of Public Health (US), University of Toronto (CA), Canada Research Chairs (CA), Max Planck Institute of Microstructure Physics (DE), SmartFactory (Germany) (DE), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

AI agents for photonic integrated circuit design automation — A. Surjalal Sharma, Yuqi Fu, et al. · APL Machine Learning (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS