Bioprinting the Osteochondral Interface: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions

Osteochondral (OC) defects, involving simultaneous damage to articular cartilage and subchondral bone, remain clinically challenging due to the distinct biological, mechanical, and structural characteristics of each layer. Traditional repair techniques are limited by poor integration and inadequate tissue regeneration. 3D bioprinting has emerged as a promising strategy to fabricate biomimetic OC constructs with precise spatial control over scaffold architecture, cell distribution, and bioactive cues. This review summarizes recent advancements in additive manufacturing techniques and their applications in OC tissue engineering. Scaffold design strategies are discussed, along with the selection of biofunctional materials. Special focus is given to recent progress in bioink development, including the precise incorporation of growth factors, zonal patterning of stem cells to guide region-specific differentiation, and the integration of bioceramics to enhance osteogenic potential while supporting chondrogenic matrix formation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tissue Engineering Part A
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/19373341251410101
Primary Topic
Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bioprinting the Osteochondral Interface: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions

Murat Güvendiren, Hang Truong
Tissue Engineering Part A
Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
article

Bioprinting the Osteochondral Interface: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions

Murat Güvendiren, Hang Truong
article en

Abstract

Osteochondral (OC) defects, involving simultaneous damage to articular cartilage and subchondral bone, remain clinically challenging due to the distinct biological, mechanical, and structural characteristics of each layer. Traditional repair techniques are limited by poor integration and inadequate tissue regeneration. 3D bioprinting has emerged as a promising strategy to fabricate biomimetic OC constructs with precise spatial control over scaffold architecture, cell distribution, and bioactive cues. This review summarizes recent advancements in additive manufacturing techniques and their applications in OC tissue engineering. Scaffold design strategies are discussed, along with the selection of biofunctional materials. Special focus is given to recent progress in bioink development, including the precise incorporation of growth factors, zonal patterning of stem cells to guide region-specific differentiation, and the integration of bioceramics to enhance osteogenic potential while supporting chondrogenic matrix formation.

Tissue Engineering Part A
New Jersey Institute of Technology (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Bioprinting the Osteochondral Interface: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions — Murat Güvendiren, Hang Truong · Tissue Engineering Part A (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS