Changes in pharmaceutical industry payments to physicians after New Jersey's 2018 restriction

The federal government and several states have implemented measures to restrict, ban, and increase transparency of promotional payments from pharmaceutical companies to clinicians who prescribe medications. In 2018, New Jersey adopted a novel rule that included a $10 000 restriction on aggregate annual prescriber compensation for promotional speaking, advisory board participation, and consulting arrangements. In this study, we estimated changes associated with the restriction by comparing payments made to physicians in New Jersey to those in a comparator state, Pennsylvania, where no such rule exists. We found that the New Jersey restriction was associated with no significant difference in the proportion of physicians receiving aggregate honoraria and consulting payments above $10 000 annually as compared to physicians in Pennsylvania. Further research is needed to better understand the effect of state policies restricting pharmaceutical industry payments to prescribers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Affairs Scholar
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxaf254
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Changes in pharmaceutical industry payments to physicians after New Jersey's 2018 restriction

Reshma Ramachandran, Neeraj G. Patel, Joseph S Ross
Health Affairs Scholar
Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
article

Changes in pharmaceutical industry payments to physicians after New Jersey's 2018 restriction

Reshma Ramachandran, Neeraj G. Patel, Joseph S Ross
article en

Abstract

The federal government and several states have implemented measures to restrict, ban, and increase transparency of promotional payments from pharmaceutical companies to clinicians who prescribe medications. In 2018, New Jersey adopted a novel rule that included a $10 000 restriction on aggregate annual prescriber compensation for promotional speaking, advisory board participation, and consulting arrangements. In this study, we estimated changes associated with the restriction by comparing payments made to physicians in New Jersey to those in a comparator state, Pennsylvania, where no such rule exists. We found that the New Jersey restriction was associated with no significant difference in the proportion of physicians receiving aggregate honoraria and consulting payments above $10 000 annually as compared to physicians in Pennsylvania. Further research is needed to better understand the effect of state policies restricting pharmaceutical industry payments to prescribers.

Health Affairs ScholarVol. 4(1)
Yale University (US), Yale New Haven Health System (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.