Circulaţia Poeziei Martei Petreu în Contextul Literaturii Mondiale

Abstract The present paper examines the international reception of Marta Petreu’s poetry, focusing on its circulation, translation, and critical integration into world literature. While Petreu’s work has been translated into multiple languages and presented at international literary events, these efforts have not secured her a stable position within the global literary canon. This study emphasizes the difference between circulation and integration of literary artefacts, arguing that translations alone do not necessarily guarantee critical recognition or an organic readership. Moreover, as I’ve discovered, the reception of Marta Petreu’s poetry is mostly limited to accompanying texts written by translators, lacking broader critical discourse or readers’ engagement. Ultimately, this paper argues that continuous recognition – both critical and from a more general readership – is essential for a literary work to truly become part of world literature, a status Petreu’s poetry hasn’t achieved yet despite its ongoing export.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Caietele "Lucian Blaga"
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/clb-2024-0012
Primary Topic
Comparative and World Literature
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Circulaţia Poeziei Martei Petreu în Contextul Literaturii Mondiale

Ana-Maria Stoica
Caietele "Lucian Blaga"
Comparative and World Literature
article

Circulaţia Poeziei Martei Petreu în Contextul Literaturii Mondiale

Ana-Maria Stoica
article en

Abstract

Abstract The present paper examines the international reception of Marta Petreu’s poetry, focusing on its circulation, translation, and critical integration into world literature. While Petreu’s work has been translated into multiple languages and presented at international literary events, these efforts have not secured her a stable position within the global literary canon. This study emphasizes the difference between circulation and integration of literary artefacts, arguing that translations alone do not necessarily guarantee critical recognition or an organic readership. Moreover, as I’ve discovered, the reception of Marta Petreu’s poetry is mostly limited to accompanying texts written by translators, lacking broader critical discourse or readers’ engagement. Ultimately, this paper argues that continuous recognition – both critical and from a more general readership – is essential for a literary work to truly become part of world literature, a status Petreu’s poetry hasn’t achieved yet despite its ongoing export.

Caietele "Lucian Blaga"Vol. 25(1-2)
Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu (RO)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Comparative and World Literature
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.