Comparative evaluation of hydraulic fracturing performance in vertical and horizontal wells using pipesim software

This research paper uses pipesim software to reproduce and evaluate well performance, comparing vertical and horizontal wells using hydraulic fracturing. It examines the impact of key parameters, such as fracture length, width, permeability, and fracture number, on production improvement. In low-permeability reservoirs, simulation studies indicate that horizontal wells often achieve higher production rates than vertical wells, largely due to improved reservoir and fracture connectivity. Productivity in the vertical well increased to 300(stb/d), while in the horizontal well, it increased to over 9,000 (stb/d) after using hydraulic fracturing. The results indicate that fracture width has less of an impact on the performance of vertical wells than horizontal wells, although fracture length and fracture number significantly influence horizontal well productivity. This disparity underscores the need for strategic fracture design and well selection to optimize oil production under changing reservoir conditions. The research paper emphasizes the need to use advanced modeling tools such as PIPESIM to accurately predict well performance and guide decision-making in hydraulic fracturing operations. Tailor-made fracturing techniques based on reservoir properties can significantly enhance continuous production efficiency and extend well life.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31699/ijcpe.2025.4.2
Primary Topic
Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative evaluation of hydraulic fracturing performance in vertical and horizontal wells using pipesim software

Yasir M. F. Mukhtar, Bonavian Hasiholan, Huda J.TH. Al-Hilali, Faleh H. M. Almahdawi
Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering
Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
article

Comparative evaluation of hydraulic fracturing performance in vertical and horizontal wells using pipesim software

Yasir M. F. Mukhtar, Bonavian Hasiholan, Huda J.TH. Al-Hilali, Faleh H. M. Almahdawi
article en

Abstract

This research paper uses pipesim software to reproduce and evaluate well performance, comparing vertical and horizontal wells using hydraulic fracturing. It examines the impact of key parameters, such as fracture length, width, permeability, and fracture number, on production improvement. In low-permeability reservoirs, simulation studies indicate that horizontal wells often achieve higher production rates than vertical wells, largely due to improved reservoir and fracture connectivity. Productivity in the vertical well increased to 300(stb/d), while in the horizontal well, it increased to over 9,000 (stb/d) after using hydraulic fracturing. The results indicate that fracture width has less of an impact on the performance of vertical wells than horizontal wells, although fracture length and fracture number significantly influence horizontal well productivity. This disparity underscores the need for strategic fracture design and well selection to optimize oil production under changing reservoir conditions. The research paper emphasizes the need to use advanced modeling tools such as PIPESIM to accurately predict well performance and guide decision-making in hydraulic fracturing operations. Tailor-made fracturing techniques based on reservoir properties can significantly enhance continuous production efficiency and extend well life.

Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum EngineeringVol. 26(4)
University of Baghdad (IQ), China University of Petroleum, Beijing (CN), UCSI University (MY), Sudan University of Science and Technology (SD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.