Management and Socio-economic Aspects of Livestock Farming in Flood-prone Areas of Cuddalore District

A detailed survey was conducted from September, 2020 to February, 2021 to document the socio-economic status and livestockrearing practices in the flood-prone areas of Cuddalore district. This study assessed the socio-economic profile, livestock holdings, housing practices, stocking density, and feeding management of livestock farmers in flood-prone areas of Cuddalore district, Tamil Nadu. Floods, among the major natural disasters affecting agriculture and livestock-based livelihoods in coastal regions of India. A total of 600 households (20 villages×30 farmers) were surveyed across three Geographical Areas (GGA I: 0–10 m, GGA II: 11–20 m, GGA III: >20 m above mean sea level). Results revealed a predominance of male farmers (63.83%) with an overall literacy rate of 64.48%, lower than the district average. Most farmers were daily wage labourers (65.17%) and had landholdings below one acre, with 33% landless. Thatched-roof housing was the most common (49.17%), and a significant proportion of farmers (40.16%) lacked any animal shelter. Livestock holdings were generally small, with non-descriptive cattle and goats predominating, and significant variations were observed in crossbred cow, goat, and sheep numbers across GGAs. The mean number of animals shed-1 ranged from 9.67 to 12.27, with higher stocking densities in GGA II. Regular concentrate feeding averaged 1.20 kg day-1, increasing to 3.81 kg day-1 after floods to support recovery. The study highlighted that low literacy, small landholdings, and limited infrastructure constrained adaptive capacity among livestock farmers. These findings underscored the need for targeted extension services, flood-resilient animal housing, and improved feeding strategies to enhance livestock resilience in flood-prone areas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23910/1.2025.6685
Primary Topic
Agricultural Systems and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Management and Socio-economic Aspects of Livestock Farming in Flood-prone Areas of Cuddalore District

M. S. Kannadhasan, N. Vengadabady, T. T. Vannan, K. P. Saravanan et al.
International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management
Agricultural Systems and Practices
article

Management and Socio-economic Aspects of Livestock Farming in Flood-prone Areas of Cuddalore District

M. S. Kannadhasan, N. Vengadabady, T. T. Vannan, K. P. Saravanan, S. Vasudevan, Richard Churchil, P. Silambarasan
article en

Abstract

A detailed survey was conducted from September, 2020 to February, 2021 to document the socio-economic status and livestockrearing practices in the flood-prone areas of Cuddalore district. This study assessed the socio-economic profile, livestock holdings, housing practices, stocking density, and feeding management of livestock farmers in flood-prone areas of Cuddalore district, Tamil Nadu. Floods, among the major natural disasters affecting agriculture and livestock-based livelihoods in coastal regions of India. A total of 600 households (20 villages×30 farmers) were surveyed across three Geographical Areas (GGA I: 0–10 m, GGA II: 11–20 m, GGA III: >20 m above mean sea level). Results revealed a predominance of male farmers (63.83%) with an overall literacy rate of 64.48%, lower than the district average. Most farmers were daily wage labourers (65.17%) and had landholdings below one acre, with 33% landless. Thatched-roof housing was the most common (49.17%), and a significant proportion of farmers (40.16%) lacked any animal shelter. Livestock holdings were generally small, with non-descriptive cattle and goats predominating, and significant variations were observed in crossbred cow, goat, and sheep numbers across GGAs. The mean number of animals shed-1 ranged from 9.67 to 12.27, with higher stocking densities in GGA II. Regular concentrate feeding averaged 1.20 kg day-1, increasing to 3.81 kg day-1 after floods to support recovery. The study highlighted that low literacy, small landholdings, and limited infrastructure constrained adaptive capacity among livestock farmers. These findings underscored the need for targeted extension services, flood-resilient animal housing, and improved feeding strategies to enhance livestock resilience in flood-prone areas.

International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress ManagementVol. 16(Dec, 12)
Tamil University (IN), Madras Medical College (IN), Annamalai University (IN), University of Madras (IN), Centro Universitario Didaskalos (MX), Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University (IN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Agricultural Systems and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.