Optimizing Body Size‐Based Dosing Approaches for Antibody–Drug Conjugates

Optimized dosing precision of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) remains challenging due to narrow therapeutic indices, efficacious doses near the maximum tolerated dose, and substantial interindividual variability in exposure. Body size-based dosing can reduce exposure variability when the allometric scaling exponent for clearance α = 1 but may over- or underexpose patients with extreme body size when α ≠ 1. A recent review found α based on body weight (BW) was less than 0.7 for 8 of 10 approved ADCs,<sup>1</sup> indicating room for improvement. This follow-up article outlines the strategy for dosing approach selection to enhance ADC dosing precision. To assess the performance of different body size metrics, α was re-estimated to BW, body surface area (BSA), ideal body weight (IBW), and adjusted IBW (AIBW). Simulations were conducted to evaluate the performance of dose capping. Results showed that all 15 approved ADCs used body size-based dosing, with seven using an upper dose cap, even when α < 0.5. AIBW and BSA commonly had an α closer to 1 compared with BW while IBW performed poorly due to lack of BW consideration. Simulations showed that when α was not close enough to 0 or 1 (e.g., 0.4 ≤ α ≤ 0.7), dose capping helped maintain percent AUC difference between patients extreme and normal body size within the desired range (e.g., 20%) with an upper dose cap when α ≥ 0.5 or a lower dose cap when α ≤ 0.5. Based on these findings, a decision tree is proposed to guide dosing strategy selection across drug development stages, by implementing model-informed approaches to improve ADC therapeutic outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.70188
Primary Topic
HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing Body Size‐Based Dosing Approaches for Antibody–Drug Conjugates

D. Wang, Andrew B. SyBing
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
article

Optimizing Body Size‐Based Dosing Approaches for Antibody–Drug Conjugates

D. Wang, Andrew B. SyBing
article en

Abstract

Optimized dosing precision of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) remains challenging due to narrow therapeutic indices, efficacious doses near the maximum tolerated dose, and substantial interindividual variability in exposure. Body size-based dosing can reduce exposure variability when the allometric scaling exponent for clearance α = 1 but may over- or underexpose patients with extreme body size when α ≠ 1. A recent review found α based on body weight (BW) was less than 0.7 for 8 of 10 approved ADCs,<sup>1</sup> indicating room for improvement. This follow-up article outlines the strategy for dosing approach selection to enhance ADC dosing precision. To assess the performance of different body size metrics, α was re-estimated to BW, body surface area (BSA), ideal body weight (IBW), and adjusted IBW (AIBW). Simulations were conducted to evaluate the performance of dose capping. Results showed that all 15 approved ADCs used body size-based dosing, with seven using an upper dose cap, even when α < 0.5. AIBW and BSA commonly had an α closer to 1 compared with BW while IBW performed poorly due to lack of BW consideration. Simulations showed that when α was not close enough to 0 or 1 (e.g., 0.4 ≤ α ≤ 0.7), dose capping helped maintain percent AUC difference between patients extreme and normal body size within the desired range (e.g., 20%) with an upper dose cap when α ≥ 0.5 or a lower dose cap when α ≤ 0.5. Based on these findings, a decision tree is proposed to guide dosing strategy selection across drug development stages, by implementing model-informed approaches to improve ADC therapeutic outcomes.

Clinical Pharmacology & TherapeuticsVol. 119(4)
Pfizer (United States) (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.