On Sense-making, Groove, and Choice in Experimental Improvised Music

Improvising musicians—especially towards the “freer” or more “experimental” end of the spectrum—are often seen as having the space to do just about anything. But actual improvisations are (also) processes of what enactivist philosophers Hanne De Jaegher and Ezequiel Di Paolo call “participatory sense-making”; musicians’ active choices are both enabled and constrained by musical phenomena, or “autonomous organising principles”, that emerge between them. Here we explore one example of such phenomena: groove. We begin by theorizing groove more broadly as a “grid” and as “participatory discrepancies”, emphasizing how groove shows a form of agency in processes of sense-making. We then analyze sense-making at work in a case of emergent groove performed by the 21-piece experimental improvising ensemble Splitter Orchester. We conclude that collective sense-making is a dynamic process in which individual agents negotiate not only with each other, but also the shared norms and emergent other-than-human processes that they enact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Performance Philosophy
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21476/pp.2025.101483
Primary Topic
Embodied and Extended Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On Sense-making, Groove, and Choice in Experimental Improvised Music

Joshua A. Bergamin, Christopher A. Williams
Performance Philosophy
Embodied and Extended Cognition
article

On Sense-making, Groove, and Choice in Experimental Improvised Music

Joshua A. Bergamin, Christopher A. Williams
article en

Abstract

Improvising musicians—especially towards the “freer” or more “experimental” end of the spectrum—are often seen as having the space to do just about anything. But actual improvisations are (also) processes of what enactivist philosophers Hanne De Jaegher and Ezequiel Di Paolo call “participatory sense-making”; musicians’ active choices are both enabled and constrained by musical phenomena, or “autonomous organising principles”, that emerge between them. Here we explore one example of such phenomena: groove. We begin by theorizing groove more broadly as a “grid” and as “participatory discrepancies”, emphasizing how groove shows a form of agency in processes of sense-making. We then analyze sense-making at work in a case of emergent groove performed by the 21-piece experimental improvising ensemble Splitter Orchester. We conclude that collective sense-making is a dynamic process in which individual agents negotiate not only with each other, but also the shared norms and emergent other-than-human processes that they enact.

Performance PhilosophyVol. 10(1)
University of Vienna (AT), Music and Arts University of the City of Vienna (AT), University of Music and Performing Arts Graz (AT)
Austrian Science Fund, Universität Wien
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Embodied and Extended Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

On Sense-making, Groove, and Choice in Experimental Improvised Music — Joshua A. Bergamin, Christopher A. Williams · Performance Philosophy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS