The Global Environmental Politics of Resistance, Revisited

Abstract In the inaugural issue of Global Environmental Politics, three scholars debated how social movements could or should address the role of resistance in environmental politics. In this essay, we revisit and renew dialogue around the scholarship of resistance for environmental politics. This intervention serves to reignite discussion and scholarship about resistance in our current conjuncture. We suggest that environmental research should address the tumultuous, turbulent, and ruinous times for environmental concerns and environmental institutions through leveraging the concept of resistance and should engage studies of resistance using an increased focus on multiscalar geographies, intersectional critiques, and collaborative potentials of coalitions and scholar-activist praxis. Doing so will not only make resistance studies in the present moment a more relevant and serious focus of inquiry and practice but will also give relevance to studies of environmental politics in the face of backsliding and backlash more generally.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Environmental Politics
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.a.719
Primary Topic
Water Governance and Infrastructure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Global Environmental Politics of Resistance, Revisited

Eve Z. Bratman, Ronnie D. Lipschutz, Adam Jadhav, Jeff Vance Martin et al.
Global Environmental Politics
Water Governance and Infrastructure
article

The Global Environmental Politics of Resistance, Revisited

Eve Z. Bratman, Ronnie D. Lipschutz, Adam Jadhav, Jeff Vance Martin, Jane Henderson
article en

Abstract

Abstract In the inaugural issue of Global Environmental Politics, three scholars debated how social movements could or should address the role of resistance in environmental politics. In this essay, we revisit and renew dialogue around the scholarship of resistance for environmental politics. This intervention serves to reignite discussion and scholarship about resistance in our current conjuncture. We suggest that environmental research should address the tumultuous, turbulent, and ruinous times for environmental concerns and environmental institutions through leveraging the concept of resistance and should engage studies of resistance using an increased focus on multiscalar geographies, intersectional critiques, and collaborative potentials of coalitions and scholar-activist praxis. Doing so will not only make resistance studies in the present moment a more relevant and serious focus of inquiry and practice but will also give relevance to studies of environmental politics in the face of backsliding and backlash more generally.

Global Environmental PoliticsVol. 26(1)
Medical Protective (US), Schlumberger (Ireland) (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Water Governance and Infrastructure
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Global Environmental Politics of Resistance, Revisited — Eve Z. Bratman, Ronnie D. Lipschutz, et al. · Global Environmental Politics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS