How do people with fibromyalgia interpret ambiguous cues in empathy-related healthcare scenarios?

Empathic communication is essential for high-quality healthcare, yet patients must often interpret subtle and ambiguous interpersonal cues during healthcare encounters. In such contexts, prior experiences and cognitive-affective processes may shape interpretations in biased ways. In Fibromyalgia Syndrome (FMS), a frequently stigmatised and 'invisible' condition, such biases may influence how patients perceive unclear messages from healthcare professionals. While interpretation bias for pain-related information has been explored, bias in interpreting social-emotional information has not. This study investigated interpretations of ambiguous social-emotional cues from healthcare professionals in individuals with FMS (n = 65), compared with those with other chronic pain conditions (n = 51) and pain-free controls (n = 77). Participants completed a novel scenario-based task assessing the perceived likelihood of positive, neutral, and negative interpretations of ambiguous clinical situations. Validated self-report measures of psychological distress and perceived clinical empathy were also administered. Results showed that individuals with FMS were significantly more likely to endorse negative interpretations and less likely to endorse positive ones relative to both comparison groups, even after controlling for depression, anxiety, and stress. The FMS group also reported greater psychological distress and lower perceived empathy. Moreover, negative interpretation bias was associated with greater distress and lower perceived clinical empathy, while positive bias showed the opposite pattern. These findings suggest that individuals with FMS interpret ambiguous healthcare communication through a distinct cognitive-affective lens. This highlights that patient-provider interactions are not experienced uniformly across chronic pain populations, and that interpretative biases should be considered to improve healthcare communication. PERSPECTIVE: We explored how individuals with fibromyalgia (compared to other chronic pain and pain-free groups) interpret empathy-related ambiguous cues from healthcare professionals. Controlling for psychological distress, the fibromyalgia group showed a stronger negative interpretation bias than both comparison groups. Understanding these socio-cognitive patterns may help improve communication and empathy in fibromyalgia care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pain
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2025.106181
Primary Topic
Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How do people with fibromyalgia interpret ambiguous cues in empathy-related healthcare scenarios?

Charlotte Krahé, Katie Herron, Nicholas Fallon, Maria Planes Alias et al.
Journal of Pain
Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
article

How do people with fibromyalgia interpret ambiguous cues in empathy-related healthcare scenarios?

Charlotte Krahé, Katie Herron, Nicholas Fallon, Maria Planes Alias, David J Moore
article en

Abstract

Empathic communication is essential for high-quality healthcare, yet patients must often interpret subtle and ambiguous interpersonal cues during healthcare encounters. In such contexts, prior experiences and cognitive-affective processes may shape interpretations in biased ways. In Fibromyalgia Syndrome (FMS), a frequently stigmatised and 'invisible' condition, such biases may influence how patients perceive unclear messages from healthcare professionals. While interpretation bias for pain-related information has been explored, bias in interpreting social-emotional information has not. This study investigated interpretations of ambiguous social-emotional cues from healthcare professionals in individuals with FMS (n = 65), compared with those with other chronic pain conditions (n = 51) and pain-free controls (n = 77). Participants completed a novel scenario-based task assessing the perceived likelihood of positive, neutral, and negative interpretations of ambiguous clinical situations. Validated self-report measures of psychological distress and perceived clinical empathy were also administered. Results showed that individuals with FMS were significantly more likely to endorse negative interpretations and less likely to endorse positive ones relative to both comparison groups, even after controlling for depression, anxiety, and stress. The FMS group also reported greater psychological distress and lower perceived empathy. Moreover, negative interpretation bias was associated with greater distress and lower perceived clinical empathy, while positive bias showed the opposite pattern. These findings suggest that individuals with FMS interpret ambiguous healthcare communication through a distinct cognitive-affective lens. This highlights that patient-provider interactions are not experienced uniformly across chronic pain populations, and that interpretative biases should be considered to improve healthcare communication. PERSPECTIVE: We explored how individuals with fibromyalgia (compared to other chronic pain and pain-free groups) interpret empathy-related ambiguous cues from healthcare professionals. Controlling for psychological distress, the fibromyalgia group showed a stronger negative interpretation bias than both comparison groups. Understanding these socio-cognitive patterns may help improve communication and empathy in fibromyalgia care.

Journal of PainVol. 40
University of Liverpool (GB), Walton Centre (GB), Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.