Modelling the Milky Way’s exoplanet population based on cosmological galaxy simulations

Context. Exoplanet transit and radial-velocity surveys have allowed us to explore the exoplanet population in our Galactic surroundings. The planet populations in more remote areas of the Milky Way (MW) will become accessible with future instrumentation. Aims. In this paper, we aim to simulate realistic exoplanet populations across different regions of the MW by combining state-of-the-art cosmological simulations of our Galaxy with exoplanet formation models and observations. Methods. We model the exoplanet populations around simulated single stars, using planet occurrence rate and multiplicity depending on stellar mass, metallicity, and planet type, and assign them physical parameters such as mass and orbital period. Results. Focussing first on the solar vicinity, we find mostly metallicity-driven differences in the distributions of non-hosting and planet-hosting single stars. In our simulated solar neighbourhood, 52.5% of all planets are Earth-like (23% of them located in the Habitable Zone), 44% are super-Earths or Neptunes, and 3.5% are giant planets. A detailed comparison with the census of Kepler exoplanets and candidates shows that, when taking into account the most relevant selection effects, we obtain a similar distribution of exoplanets compared to the observed population. However, we also detect some significant differences in the exoplanet and host star distributions (e.g. more planets around F-type and red-giant stars compared to the observations) that we attribute mostly to a too strong recent star formation and a too large disc scale height in the simulation compared to the solar neighbourhood, as well as to some caveats in our exoplanet population synthesis that will be addressed in future work. Extending our analysis to other regions of the simulated MW and to other galaxies within the same suite of simulations, we find that the relative percentages of Earth-like, super-Earth or Neptunes, and giant planets remain largely consistent as long as the simulated galaxy matches the morphology and mass of the MW. Conclusions. We have created a fast and flexible framework to produce exoplanet populations based on MW-like simulations that can easily be adapted to produce predictions for the yields of future exoplanet detection missions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202557051/pdf
Primary Topic
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modelling the Milky Way’s exoplanet population based on cosmological galaxy simulations

João A. S. Amarante, Daniel del Ser, Daisuke Kawata, Hélio D. Perottoni et al.
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
article

Modelling the Milky Way’s exoplanet population based on cosmological galaxy simulations

João A. S. Amarante, Daniel del Ser, Daisuke Kawata, Hélio D. Perottoni, Chloé Padois, Diogo Martins Souto, Eder Martioli, Friedrich Anders, Nayara I. Feliciano-Souza, Thomas Hajnik
article en

Abstract

Context. Exoplanet transit and radial-velocity surveys have allowed us to explore the exoplanet population in our Galactic surroundings. The planet populations in more remote areas of the Milky Way (MW) will become accessible with future instrumentation. Aims. In this paper, we aim to simulate realistic exoplanet populations across different regions of the MW by combining state-of-the-art cosmological simulations of our Galaxy with exoplanet formation models and observations. Methods. We model the exoplanet populations around simulated single stars, using planet occurrence rate and multiplicity depending on stellar mass, metallicity, and planet type, and assign them physical parameters such as mass and orbital period. Results. Focussing first on the solar vicinity, we find mostly metallicity-driven differences in the distributions of non-hosting and planet-hosting single stars. In our simulated solar neighbourhood, 52.5% of all planets are Earth-like (23% of them located in the Habitable Zone), 44% are super-Earths or Neptunes, and 3.5% are giant planets. A detailed comparison with the census of Kepler exoplanets and candidates shows that, when taking into account the most relevant selection effects, we obtain a similar distribution of exoplanets compared to the observed population. However, we also detect some significant differences in the exoplanet and host star distributions (e.g. more planets around F-type and red-giant stars compared to the observations) that we attribute mostly to a too strong recent star formation and a too large disc scale height in the simulation compared to the solar neighbourhood, as well as to some caveats in our exoplanet population synthesis that will be addressed in future work. Extending our analysis to other regions of the simulated MW and to other galaxies within the same suite of simulations, we find that the relative percentages of Earth-like, super-Earth or Neptunes, and giant planets remain largely consistent as long as the simulated galaxy matches the morphology and mass of the MW. Conclusions. We have created a fast and flexible framework to produce exoplanet populations based on MW-like simulations that can easily be adapted to produce predictions for the yields of future exoplanet detection missions.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.