Performative Utopias: Making Space, Taking Time, Doing Differently?

In an increasingly dystopian world, the notion of ‘utopia’ might seem all but obliterated, yet at the same time, it has become a productive concept for social theory and cultural practice. Joining many utopian revivalists who have addressed utopias as real, critical, minor, or sustainable, this essay makes the case that utopia could also be fruit-fully understood as a matter of performance, or ‘doing differently’—not in the sense of representing let alone feigning, that is, but as bringing something into being. Noting a shared suspicion over both ideas (“only performative,” “just a utopia”), the essay’s two central sections ask how each concept could shed light on the other’s perceived blind spots. Defining performativity as a ‘doing of things,’ first, the very opposition of utopia and reality opens out toward a dramaturgy of real-world utopias at different stages of their performance: people ‘do’ something, and it begins to look like some ‘thing.’ Based on definitions of utopia as a ‘no-place’ that is ‘not-yet,’ second, the ‘realities’ that make it impossible are identified with all those routines that actively take the time, space, and energy from doing anything more aspirational. Hence performative utopias are located in oppositional practices that begin with simply taking the time and making the space.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Performance Philosophy
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21476/pp.2025.101530
Primary Topic
Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performative Utopias: Making Space, Taking Time, Doing Differently?

Teemu Paavolainen
Performance Philosophy
Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction
article

Performative Utopias: Making Space, Taking Time, Doing Differently?

Teemu Paavolainen
article en

Abstract

In an increasingly dystopian world, the notion of ‘utopia’ might seem all but obliterated, yet at the same time, it has become a productive concept for social theory and cultural practice. Joining many utopian revivalists who have addressed utopias as real, critical, minor, or sustainable, this essay makes the case that utopia could also be fruit-fully understood as a matter of performance, or ‘doing differently’—not in the sense of representing let alone feigning, that is, but as bringing something into being. Noting a shared suspicion over both ideas (“only performative,” “just a utopia”), the essay’s two central sections ask how each concept could shed light on the other’s perceived blind spots. Defining performativity as a ‘doing of things,’ first, the very opposition of utopia and reality opens out toward a dramaturgy of real-world utopias at different stages of their performance: people ‘do’ something, and it begins to look like some ‘thing.’ Based on definitions of utopia as a ‘no-place’ that is ‘not-yet,’ second, the ‘realities’ that make it impossible are identified with all those routines that actively take the time, space, and energy from doing anything more aspirational. Hence performative utopias are located in oppositional practices that begin with simply taking the time and making the space.

Performance PhilosophyVol. 10(1)
Tampere University (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.