Effect of facility- versus community-based HIV testing services on the diagnosis of advanced HIV disease in Uganda: a quasi-experimental study

Advanced HIV disease (AHD) at first diagnosis remains a significant barrier to HIV epidemic control. We evaluated whether health facility-based or community-based HIV testing services (HTS) better impact the yield of AHD at diagnosis among newly diagnosed people with HIV (PWH) in rural eastern Uganda. We designed a quasi-experimental study and applied instrumental variable analysis, a causal inference methodology, to compare the effect of facility-based HTS versus community-based HTS on the yield of AHD at diagnosis among newly diagnosed PWH. The exposure was HTS comparing community-based versus facility-based, and the outcome was AHD at diagnosis, defined as CD4 < 200 cells/µL or WHO clinical stage 3 or 4 disease at baseline. The instrumental variable was the HTS access radius that reflects the HTS geographical coverage for each health facility. The instrumental variable ensured the categorization of health facilities as offering HTS within a 5 km radius only or both within and beyond 5 km. The relevance of the instrumental variable was assessed using the F-statistic and independence from measured covariates. We used a two-stage residual inclusion approach to estimate the effect of HTS on AHD at diagnosis. Causal effect was reported as an odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Of 1,233 participants included in the analysis, AHD prevalence was 1.9% (24/1,233). The instrumental variable was strongly correlated with HTS (First-stage F-statistic = 28.05, p < 0.0001) and uncorrelated with AHD and all measured covariates. Facility-based HTS has no significant effect on AHD at diagnosis compared to community-based HTS (OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.49–2.90). Persons with AHD at diagnosis are a minority. Facility- and community-based HTS do not differ in identifying AHD among newly diagnosed PWH, but moderate effects cannot be excluded. These findings support efforts to implement both strategies for HIV testing to reach and test persons with advanced HIV.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-025-12488-9
Primary Topic
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of facility- versus community-based HIV testing services on the diagnosis of advanced HIV disease in Uganda: a quasi-experimental study

Jonathan Izudi, Francis Bajunirwe, Saidi Appeli, Saadick Mugerwa Ssentongo
BMC Infectious Diseases
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
article

Effect of facility- versus community-based HIV testing services on the diagnosis of advanced HIV disease in Uganda: a quasi-experimental study

Jonathan Izudi, Francis Bajunirwe, Saidi Appeli, Saadick Mugerwa Ssentongo
article en

Abstract

Advanced HIV disease (AHD) at first diagnosis remains a significant barrier to HIV epidemic control. We evaluated whether health facility-based or community-based HIV testing services (HTS) better impact the yield of AHD at diagnosis among newly diagnosed people with HIV (PWH) in rural eastern Uganda. We designed a quasi-experimental study and applied instrumental variable analysis, a causal inference methodology, to compare the effect of facility-based HTS versus community-based HTS on the yield of AHD at diagnosis among newly diagnosed PWH. The exposure was HTS comparing community-based versus facility-based, and the outcome was AHD at diagnosis, defined as CD4 < 200 cells/µL or WHO clinical stage 3 or 4 disease at baseline. The instrumental variable was the HTS access radius that reflects the HTS geographical coverage for each health facility. The instrumental variable ensured the categorization of health facilities as offering HTS within a 5 km radius only or both within and beyond 5 km. The relevance of the instrumental variable was assessed using the F-statistic and independence from measured covariates. We used a two-stage residual inclusion approach to estimate the effect of HTS on AHD at diagnosis. Causal effect was reported as an odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Of 1,233 participants included in the analysis, AHD prevalence was 1.9% (24/1,233). The instrumental variable was strongly correlated with HTS (First-stage F-statistic = 28.05, p < 0.0001) and uncorrelated with AHD and all measured covariates. Facility-based HTS has no significant effect on AHD at diagnosis compared to community-based HTS (OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.49–2.90). Persons with AHD at diagnosis are a minority. Facility- and community-based HTS do not differ in identifying AHD among newly diagnosed PWH, but moderate effects cannot be excluded. These findings support efforts to implement both strategies for HIV testing to reach and test persons with advanced HIV.

BMC Infectious DiseasesVol. 26(1)
Mbarara University of Science and Technology (UG), AIDS Information Centre (UG), Busitema University (UG), Muni University (UG)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.