Proteomic comparison of human brain tissue preservation methods

This study investigated the impact of tissue preservation methods on protein profiles analyzed by reversed-phase liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) using data-independent acquisition (DIA). Proteomic profiles from formalin-fixed, formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE), and fresh-frozen human brain tissues (cortex and hippocampus, n = 6) were compared, including an FFPE-specific protein extraction kit (n = 4). Formalin-fixed samples more closely resembled fresh-frozen profiles than FFPE or FFPE-Kit samples, while still showing high correlation and overlap with FFPE tissues in principal component analyses. A core set of 1753 proteins was consistently detected across all sample preparation methods. A total of 35 proteins were identified exclusively in fresh-frozen samples, but without functional enrichment. Quantitative comparisons to the proteome of fresh-frozen tissue revealed an underrepresentation of cellular processes, energy metabolism, signaling, and transport related to protein properties such as length, location, and hydrophobicity. In contrast, neuronal development and phagosome-related pathways were overrepresented in fixed tissues. In a pilot study comparing low (Braak 0-II, n = 4) and high (Braak IV-VI, n = 4) Alzheimer's disease (AD) stages using formalin-fixed samples, we identified 12 potential protein biomarkers, primarily nucleosomal proteins and carboxypeptidase M (CPM). These findings suggest that formalin-fixed brain tissue provides reliable proteomic information, making it a valuable resource for neurodegenerative disease research. SIGNIFICANCE: Proteomics offers enormous potential for investigating the molecular regulation of the human brain. Valuable tissue samples are often preserved in formalin or additionally with paraffin for later analysis. The potential value of these preserved samples for proteomic analysis has already been recognized. However, tissue preservation poses a challenge for proteome analysis. Consequently, several studies have compared different protein extraction protocols for fixed samples. In addition, studies have been published comparing protein extraction from FFPE samples with fresh-frozen samples. To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare protein extraction across all three tissue preservation methods with subsequent functional analysis using samples obtained from the same donors, thereby eliminating inter-donor variability and enabling a direct comparison of preservation effects. This study validates a protein extraction protocol from formalin-fixed samples, laying the groundwork for future research into potential biomarkers in formalin-fixed samples.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Proteomics
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2025.105589
Primary Topic
Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Proteomic comparison of human brain tissue preservation methods

Laura Plantera, Ingo Bechmann, Uta Ceglarek, Anna Didio
Journal of Proteomics
Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
article

Proteomic comparison of human brain tissue preservation methods

Laura Plantera, Ingo Bechmann, Uta Ceglarek, Anna Didio
article en

Abstract

This study investigated the impact of tissue preservation methods on protein profiles analyzed by reversed-phase liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) using data-independent acquisition (DIA). Proteomic profiles from formalin-fixed, formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE), and fresh-frozen human brain tissues (cortex and hippocampus, n = 6) were compared, including an FFPE-specific protein extraction kit (n = 4). Formalin-fixed samples more closely resembled fresh-frozen profiles than FFPE or FFPE-Kit samples, while still showing high correlation and overlap with FFPE tissues in principal component analyses. A core set of 1753 proteins was consistently detected across all sample preparation methods. A total of 35 proteins were identified exclusively in fresh-frozen samples, but without functional enrichment. Quantitative comparisons to the proteome of fresh-frozen tissue revealed an underrepresentation of cellular processes, energy metabolism, signaling, and transport related to protein properties such as length, location, and hydrophobicity. In contrast, neuronal development and phagosome-related pathways were overrepresented in fixed tissues. In a pilot study comparing low (Braak 0-II, n = 4) and high (Braak IV-VI, n = 4) Alzheimer's disease (AD) stages using formalin-fixed samples, we identified 12 potential protein biomarkers, primarily nucleosomal proteins and carboxypeptidase M (CPM). These findings suggest that formalin-fixed brain tissue provides reliable proteomic information, making it a valuable resource for neurodegenerative disease research. SIGNIFICANCE: Proteomics offers enormous potential for investigating the molecular regulation of the human brain. Valuable tissue samples are often preserved in formalin or additionally with paraffin for later analysis. The potential value of these preserved samples for proteomic analysis has already been recognized. However, tissue preservation poses a challenge for proteome analysis. Consequently, several studies have compared different protein extraction protocols for fixed samples. In addition, studies have been published comparing protein extraction from FFPE samples with fresh-frozen samples. To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare protein extraction across all three tissue preservation methods with subsequent functional analysis using samples obtained from the same donors, thereby eliminating inter-donor variability and enabling a direct comparison of preservation effects. This study validates a protein extraction protocol from formalin-fixed samples, laying the groundwork for future research into potential biomarkers in formalin-fixed samples.

Journal of ProteomicsVol. 325
Leipzig University of Applied Sciences (DE), University Hospital Leipzig (DE), Leipzig University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.