Strategic sector coupling? Market power in heat and power markets

Power-sector decarbonisation envisages extensive uptake of variable renewable energy (VRE) technologies. Although VRE output is intermittent, coupling between heat and power sectors via combined heat and power (CHP) plants could provide the requisite flexibility. However, strategic CHP plants could use the link between the two energy sectors to manipulate electricity prices. We use a bi-level model to investigate the incentives for the exercise of such market power. At the upper level, a firm with both heat-only and CHP plants is a Stackelberg leader when determining its heat output and is constrained by power-market operations at the lower level. Such a strategic firm produces more (less) heat from its CHP (heat-only) plant vis-à-vis the social optimum to constrain its power output, thereby boosting the electricity price. Additional market power at the lower level from power-only generation induces the strategic heat producer to reduce distortions to its operations as long as the electricity market is relatively large. In order to attenuate welfare losses from such strategic behaviour, we devise an incentive-based regulatory mechanism consisting of a subsidy to or a tax on CHP heat output. Numerical examples illustrate the properties of our analytical results, which can inform future negotiations over CHP cost allocations between regulators and producers. • Decarbonisation envisages adoption of variable renewable energy (VRE). • VRE’s intermittent output could be managed by combined heat and power (CHP) plants. • Yet, strategic CHP plants have the incentive to create scarcity in the power market. • Additional market power in the electricity market may reduce such a distortion. • A regulatory mechanism to align incentives may inform cost-allocation negotiations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Economics
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.109106
Primary Topic
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strategic sector coupling? Market power in heat and power markets

Afzal Siddiqui, Sebastian Maier
Energy Economics
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
article

Strategic sector coupling? Market power in heat and power markets

Afzal Siddiqui, Sebastian Maier
article en

Abstract

Power-sector decarbonisation envisages extensive uptake of variable renewable energy (VRE) technologies. Although VRE output is intermittent, coupling between heat and power sectors via combined heat and power (CHP) plants could provide the requisite flexibility. However, strategic CHP plants could use the link between the two energy sectors to manipulate electricity prices. We use a bi-level model to investigate the incentives for the exercise of such market power. At the upper level, a firm with both heat-only and CHP plants is a Stackelberg leader when determining its heat output and is constrained by power-market operations at the lower level. Such a strategic firm produces more (less) heat from its CHP (heat-only) plant vis-à-vis the social optimum to constrain its power output, thereby boosting the electricity price. Additional market power at the lower level from power-only generation induces the strategic heat producer to reduce distortions to its operations as long as the electricity market is relatively large. In order to attenuate welfare losses from such strategic behaviour, we devise an incentive-based regulatory mechanism consisting of a subsidy to or a tax on CHP heat output. Numerical examples illustrate the properties of our analytical results, which can inform future negotiations over CHP cost allocations between regulators and producers. • Decarbonisation envisages adoption of variable renewable energy (VRE). • VRE’s intermittent output could be managed by combined heat and power (CHP) plants. • Yet, strategic CHP plants have the incentive to create scarcity in the power market. • Additional market power in the electricity market may reduce such a distortion. • A regulatory mechanism to align incentives may inform cost-allocation negotiations.

Energy EconomicsVol. 154
Kista Photonics Research Center (SE), University College London (GB), Aalto University (FI)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.