Ranking matters: Does the new format select the best teams for the knockout phase in the UEFA Champions League?

Starting in the 2024/25 season, the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) has fundamentally changed the format of its club competitions: the group stage has been replaced by a league phase played by 36 teams in an incomplete round robin format. This makes ranking the teams based on their results challenging because teams play against different sets of opponents, whose strengths vary. In this research note, we apply several well-known ranking methods for incomplete round robin tournaments to the 2024/25 UEFA Champions League league phase in order to check the robustness of the official ranking, as well as to call the attention of organizers to the non-trivial issue of ranking in these competitions. Our results show that it is doubtful whether the currently used point-based system provides the best ranking of the teams.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541251405330
Primary Topic
Sports Analytics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ranking matters: Does the new format select the best teams for the knockout phase in the UEFA Champions League?

Roel Lambers, Dries Goossens, Frits Spieksma, András Gyimesi et al.
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Sports Analytics and Performance
article

Ranking matters: Does the new format select the best teams for the knockout phase in the UEFA Champions League?

Roel Lambers, Dries Goossens, Frits Spieksma, András Gyimesi, Karel Devriesere, László Csató
article en

Abstract

Starting in the 2024/25 season, the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) has fundamentally changed the format of its club competitions: the group stage has been replaced by a league phase played by 36 teams in an incomplete round robin format. This makes ranking the teams based on their results challenging because teams play against different sets of opponents, whose strengths vary. In this research note, we apply several well-known ranking methods for incomplete round robin tournaments to the 2024/25 UEFA Champions League league phase in order to check the robustness of the official ranking, as well as to call the attention of organizers to the non-trivial issue of ranking in these competitions. Our results show that it is doubtful whether the currently used point-based system provides the best ranking of the teams.

International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Corvinus University of Budapest (HU), Ghent University Hospital (BE), Ghent University (BE), Flanders Make (Belgium) (BE), HUN-REN Institute for Computer Science and Control (HU), University of Pecs (HU), Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Sports Analytics and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ranking matters: Does the new format select the best teams for the knockout phase in the UEFA Champions League? — Roel Lambers, Dries Goossens, et al. · International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS