Comparative evaluation of the efficacy and adverse effects of telmisartan and cilnidipine in patients with hypertensive chronic kidney disease

Abstract Background: Hypertension is a common comorbidity in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), significantly contributing to disease progression and higher cardiovascular risk. Aims and Objectives: This study aimed to compare the antihypertensive effectiveness, kidney-protective effects, and safety profiles of telmisartan and cilnidipine in patients with hypertensive CKD. Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted over a 6-month period at Sree Shakthi Nursing Home in Yemmiganur. A total of 100 CKD patients with hypertension were enrolled and divided into two groups: Group A received cilnidipine 10 mg once daily, and Group B received telmisartan 40 mg once daily. Outcomes measured included changes in blood pressure, renal function parameters (serum creatinine, urea, uric acid, and proteinuria), and the incidence of adverse effects. Results: Both groups showed significant reductions in blood pressure and improvements in renal function markers. However, the cilnidipine group experienced a more notable decrease in systolic blood pressure, serum creatinine levels, and proteinuria compared to the telmisartan group. Additionally, fewer adverse effects, such as dizziness and fatigue, were reported in the cilnidipine group. Conclusion: Cilnidipine proved to be more effective than telmisartan in lowering systolic blood pressure and enhancing renal outcomes in hypertensive CKD patients, with a better safety profile. These findings suggest that cilnidipine may be a preferred treatment option for this population, although larger randomized studies are needed to confirm these results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
MGM Journal of Medical Sciences
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/mgmj.mgmj_227_25
Primary Topic
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative evaluation of the efficacy and adverse effects of telmisartan and cilnidipine in patients with hypertensive chronic kidney disease

Jagadeesh Kenchugundu, R. Ayesha Samreen, Pallavi Uppara, Naveen Goud Yemmiganur et al.
MGM Journal of Medical Sciences
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
article

Comparative evaluation of the efficacy and adverse effects of telmisartan and cilnidipine in patients with hypertensive chronic kidney disease

Jagadeesh Kenchugundu, R. Ayesha Samreen, Pallavi Uppara, Naveen Goud Yemmiganur, Vinod Gadwala
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Hypertension is a common comorbidity in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), significantly contributing to disease progression and higher cardiovascular risk. Aims and Objectives: This study aimed to compare the antihypertensive effectiveness, kidney-protective effects, and safety profiles of telmisartan and cilnidipine in patients with hypertensive CKD. Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted over a 6-month period at Sree Shakthi Nursing Home in Yemmiganur. A total of 100 CKD patients with hypertension were enrolled and divided into two groups: Group A received cilnidipine 10 mg once daily, and Group B received telmisartan 40 mg once daily. Outcomes measured included changes in blood pressure, renal function parameters (serum creatinine, urea, uric acid, and proteinuria), and the incidence of adverse effects. Results: Both groups showed significant reductions in blood pressure and improvements in renal function markers. However, the cilnidipine group experienced a more notable decrease in systolic blood pressure, serum creatinine levels, and proteinuria compared to the telmisartan group. Additionally, fewer adverse effects, such as dizziness and fatigue, were reported in the cilnidipine group. Conclusion: Cilnidipine proved to be more effective than telmisartan in lowering systolic blood pressure and enhancing renal outcomes in hypertensive CKD patients, with a better safety profile. These findings suggest that cilnidipine may be a preferred treatment option for this population, although larger randomized studies are needed to confirm these results.

MGM Journal of Medical SciencesVol. 12(4)
Rayalaseema University (IN), Kurnool Medical College (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative evaluation of the efficacy and adverse effects of telmisartan and cilnidipine in patients with hypertensive chronic kidney disease — Jagadeesh Kenchugundu, R. Ayesha Samreen, et al. · MGM Journal of Medical Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS