Development, Feasibility, and Acceptability of a Screening Resource to Assess Mild Motor Delay in 4-Year-Old Children: A Mixed Methods Study

Early childhood educators may screen for mild motor delay in 4-year-old children but require appropriate resources. This study developed and evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of an instructional resource designed for educators to screen mild motor delay. An explorative sequential mixed methods study was used to co-design an instructional resource through focus groups with early childhood educators, then pilot test and evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the instructional resource using a survey. Two focus groups guided the development of the instructional resource, a website, and manual. Eighteen educators assessed 18 children using the resources. There was good concordance in scores between educators and physiotherapist (Bland-Altman: M diff = −0.5, limits = −3.5 to 2.5). Educators ‘strongly agreed’ or ‘agreed’ on the instructional resources’ ethicality (90%), efficiency (75%), liked its use (75%), and believed it achieved its intended purpose (70%). These findings suggest that the instructional resource is feasible and acceptable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australasian Journal of Early Childhood
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/18369391251409896
Primary Topic
Children's Physical and Motor Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development, Feasibility, and Acceptability of a Screening Resource to Assess Mild Motor Delay in 4-Year-Old Children: A Mixed Methods Study

Laura S. Brown, Emre İlhan, Tina Hami
Australasian Journal of Early Childhood
Children's Physical and Motor Development
article

Development, Feasibility, and Acceptability of a Screening Resource to Assess Mild Motor Delay in 4-Year-Old Children: A Mixed Methods Study

Laura S. Brown, Emre İlhan, Tina Hami
article en

Abstract

Early childhood educators may screen for mild motor delay in 4-year-old children but require appropriate resources. This study developed and evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of an instructional resource designed for educators to screen mild motor delay. An explorative sequential mixed methods study was used to co-design an instructional resource through focus groups with early childhood educators, then pilot test and evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the instructional resource using a survey. Two focus groups guided the development of the instructional resource, a website, and manual. Eighteen educators assessed 18 children using the resources. There was good concordance in scores between educators and physiotherapist (Bland-Altman: M diff = −0.5, limits = −3.5 to 2.5). Educators ‘strongly agreed’ or ‘agreed’ on the instructional resources’ ethicality (90%), efficiency (75%), liked its use (75%), and believed it achieved its intended purpose (70%). These findings suggest that the instructional resource is feasible and acceptable.

Australasian Journal of Early Childhood
Macquarie University (AU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Children's Physical and Motor Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.