Impact of Primary Versus Secondary Grade III Meconium-Stained Amniotic Fluid on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes: A Retrospective Single-Center Study

Background: Secondary meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) is reportedly associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. In this study, we aimed to investigate the differences in maternal and neonatal outcomes between primary and secondary Grade III MSAF patients. Methods: This retrospective analysis enrolled women who experienced Grade III MSAF during childbirth between September 2020 and June 2023 in our hospital. We collected and compared the baseline characteristics, as well as maternal and neonatal outcomes, between the primary and secondary cases. For parameters with significant statistical differences and clinical significance, we performed multivariable logistic regression analysis to explore potential risk factors for secondary MSAF. Results: A total of 517 patients with Grade III MSAFs were included in the study. We found no significant difference in neonatal outcomes between the primary and secondary groups. More primary grade III MASFs occurred in the first stage of labor (53.1% vs. 28.8%, p < 0.001). A greater percentage of patients who underwent cesarean section (28.8% vs. 17.5%, p = 0.001) were in the primary group. More women with intrapartum fever were in the secondary group (19.8% vs. 28.1%, p = 0.027), but there was no significant difference in laboratory routine blood test results. This association remained significant after controlling for background confounders. However, when combined with an abnormal fetal heart rate (FHR) pattern, both the primary (9.0% vs. 33.3%, p < 0.001) and secondary (12.6% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.009) groups had increased rates of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. Conclusions: Primary Grade III MSAF is associated with an increased rate of cesarean delivery, while Grade III MSAF elevates the risk of intrapartum fever. Secondary Grade III MSAF alone does not increase the risk of NICU admission, but the presence of an abnormal FHR is a significant indicator.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Women s Health Reports
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/26884844251406490
Primary Topic
Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Primary Versus Secondary Grade III Meconium-Stained Amniotic Fluid on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes: A Retrospective Single-Center Study

Jin’e Wang, Yihan Lu, Yuxuan Tang, Ziyan Jiang et al.
Women s Health Reports
Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
article

Impact of Primary Versus Secondary Grade III Meconium-Stained Amniotic Fluid on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes: A Retrospective Single-Center Study

Jin’e Wang, Yihan Lu, Yuxuan Tang, Ziyan Jiang, Junling Fei, Runrun Feng, Shiyun Huang, Cen Cao, Xinxin Zhu, Qing Zuo, Haiyan Sun
article en

Abstract

Background: Secondary meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) is reportedly associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. In this study, we aimed to investigate the differences in maternal and neonatal outcomes between primary and secondary Grade III MSAF patients. Methods: This retrospective analysis enrolled women who experienced Grade III MSAF during childbirth between September 2020 and June 2023 in our hospital. We collected and compared the baseline characteristics, as well as maternal and neonatal outcomes, between the primary and secondary cases. For parameters with significant statistical differences and clinical significance, we performed multivariable logistic regression analysis to explore potential risk factors for secondary MSAF. Results: A total of 517 patients with Grade III MSAFs were included in the study. We found no significant difference in neonatal outcomes between the primary and secondary groups. More primary grade III MASFs occurred in the first stage of labor (53.1% vs. 28.8%, p < 0.001). A greater percentage of patients who underwent cesarean section (28.8% vs. 17.5%, p = 0.001) were in the primary group. More women with intrapartum fever were in the secondary group (19.8% vs. 28.1%, p = 0.027), but there was no significant difference in laboratory routine blood test results. This association remained significant after controlling for background confounders. However, when combined with an abnormal fetal heart rate (FHR) pattern, both the primary (9.0% vs. 33.3%, p < 0.001) and secondary (12.6% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.009) groups had increased rates of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. Conclusions: Primary Grade III MSAF is associated with an increased rate of cesarean delivery, while Grade III MSAF elevates the risk of intrapartum fever. Secondary Grade III MSAF alone does not increase the risk of NICU admission, but the presence of an abnormal FHR is a significant indicator.

Women s Health ReportsVol. 6(1)
Jiangsu Province Hospital (CN), Nanjing Medical University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.